Posted on 11/30/2017 2:09:56 AM PST by markomalley
A court date for a former Democratic IT aide has been postponed by more than a month after the defendant’s attorney, a former Hillary Clinton aide, said he’s seeking to block prosecutors from using evidence that appears to include a government laptop tied to Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz.
“The government has been in discussions with counsel for the defendants regarding complex discovery issues and other legal issues in this case, in particular issues surrounding claims of attorney-client privilege being raised by defendant Imran Awan,” court papers filed Tuesday say.
“Last night, counsel for both defendants indicated that they need additional time to review and analyze these issues, along with the voluminous discovery the government provided in this case,” according to the documents. “The government consents to this request.”
Chris Gowen, Awan’s attorney, said at the last hearing: “We do expect there being an attorney-client privilege issue in this case… What occurred is a backpack from my client was found, he was trying to get a better signal, there was a note that said attorney client privilege and a hard drive. We feel very strongly about this.”
A Capitol Police report shows that the backpack contained the following items:
#1 a Pakistani ID card with the name Mohommed Ashraf Awan
#2 a copy – not original – of a driver’s license with name Imran Awan
#3 a copy (front and back) of his congressional ID
#4 an Apple laptop with the homescreen initials ‘RepDWS’
#5 composition notebooks with notes handwritten saying ‘attorney client privilege’ and possibly discussing case details below
#6 loose letters addressed to US Attorney of DC discussing the apparent owner of the bag being investigated.
It is unclear how the handwritten note saying “attorney client privilege” could be construed to cover a hard drive, rather than the pages of notebook it was contained on.
Imran Awan, his wife, his two brothers Abid and Jamal, and a friend all worked as IT aides for dozens of Democratic members of Congress. Shortly after WikiLeaks published the Democratic National Committee’s emails and during the lead up to the 2016 election, investigators discovered indications that they were using a server “for nefarious purposes” and “could be reading and/or removing information,” according to a briefing.
They were banned from the House network in February 2017, but Wasserman Schultz, a Democrat from Florida, refused to fire Awan. Late one night in March, he left the backpack in a phone booth in a different House building than the one she occupies.
Wasserman Schultz fought to prevent law enforcement from looking at the laptop, threatening a police chief with “consequences” and implying it was “a member’s” laptop. She hired an outside lawyer, Bill Pittard, who specializes in the “speech and debate” clause of the Constitution that is designed to protect lawmakers from persecution for political stances, but lawmakers have used to try to stymie criminal probes in the past.
Now, it is Awans’ lawyers who are seeking the right to keep information in the backpack, including the “hard drive,” from being used as evidence.
Andrew McCarthy, a former chief assistant U.S. attorney who has followed the case, said “The A/C (attorney-client) privilege only applies to communications between the client and lawyer that are for the purpose of seeking legal advice and that are intended by both parties to be kept confidential… Moreover, asserting that something is A/C protected does not make it so. You still have to show that the material in question constitutes communications strictly between the lawyer and client that were for the purpose of seeking legal advice.”
“If I give my lawyer my bank records and ask him if they show evidence of a crime, the bank records do not become A/C-privileged — only his advice to me would be A/C-privileged. And if I stuck a sign on my bank records that said ‘A/C-privileged documents,’ that would not make them A/C-privileged documents,” he told The Daily Caller News Foundation Wednesday.
The notation indicates that Awan hired a lawyer long before March, because he knew he was the subject of a criminal investigation into his House activities. He was not charged with bank fraud until July, when he was arrested at the airport by the FBI. He was attempting to leave the country and prosecutors said a document he was carrying indicated he was using an alias.
The “voluminous discovery,” and the apparent importance of the hard drive to the case, also suggests the aides’ work in the House is at issue, not simply a matter of lying on requests for bank withdrawals. Democrats such as Rep. Joaquin Castro of Texas — a member of the intelligence committee — and Rep. Ted Lieu of California, however, have claimed the case has nothing to do with their work on Capitol Hill.
The men employed Abid and Jamal. “The brother you mentioned that got arrested, he was not my staffer, I used someone else who was part of the same company,” Lieu told a TV station. “If you look at the charge of the brother, he was charged with bank fraud… that has nothing to do with national security.”
Neither of the lawmakers explained why, if the only issue is alleged bank fraud by Imran, they would have fired all his relatives five months earlier.
The briefing warned that “all five of the shared employees system administrators collectively logged onto the [House Democratic] Caucus system 5,735 times, or an average of 27 times per day,” even though only one of them was authorized.
The hearing, set for Thursday, was postponed to Jan. 8. It was originally scheduled for just before Thanksgiving, but was postponed by a week after a similar request.
I was thinking last night that this loudmouth shrew has been awfully quiet!
“It is unclear how the handwritten note saying “attorney client privilege” could be construed to cover a hard drive, rather than the pages of notebook it was contained on.”
Meanwhile the FBI raided Paul Manafort’s home early in the morning, breaking down the door and rousting Manafort and his wife from bed. Then they carted off files containing privileged documents between Manafort and his attorney. Those documents were used by the special prosecutor to indict Manafort for “conspiracy to defraud the United States.”
More evidence the concept of “equal rights” is dead in 21st Century USA.
When are these Congressman going to start acting like loyal Americans?
Lieu, Castro, Wasserman Schultz, and the lot of them that employed the nefarious Awan crew, act like they are the Awans’ blood brothers......part and parcel of this band of thieves.
Elected members protecting the Pakistanis’ undermining of our safety and security is not a pretty sight.
We want it stopped.
Any and all evidence in the possession of L/E must be used.
If the Awans were stupid enough to leave evidence in a phone booth.....tough.
........all five of the Awan crew collectively logged onto the House Democratic Caucus system 5,735
times, or an average of 27 times per day,” even though only one of them was authorized to do so....
Imran's wife is the only one authorized.....and she is on-record as having accessed the Democrat Caucus system some 300 times.........incontrovertible proof that the Awans acted like a coordinated team working night and day to obtain sensitive intel.
The fbi is supposed to be the supreme law enforcement agency.
Not a tool for the swamp.
Cover up seems their specialty.
The magic negro and his minions have ruined the federal gubmint.
I have yet to hear the pious Speaker of the House condemn the democrat spy ring operating right under his nose... some could call this ‘collusion’.
Ryan also has the power to remove these Congressman from intel committee assignments.
It was broken decades before he even dreamed of getting elected.
He was simply the most proficient at taking advantage of all of the bugs (or features, depending upon how one views it).
Yes, he does. Some of his own writings might have been plucked for sale... Ryan has a history of spouting off when it appears he might look like a 'king' maker or 'king' destroyer... but he has a blank slate when it comes to overseeing 'the peoples house'.. He is a miserable failure in keeping his oath of office.
Go George Webb!
I’d love to see her get indicted and tried.
Ever notice how drudge almost never reports on this case..?
Huma’s quiet these days, too.
This case as more or less only been worked on by daily caller from what I can gather. Occasionally other outlets will mention it in passing. Which is odd given the nature of the size, scale and scope of the data stolen etc. I would take a guess that all involved simply assumed an HRC administration would be sweeping it under the rug shortly after getting in.
It SHOULD be reported on, that’s for sure.
From Day One when it all started to bubble to the surface.
[Wasserman Schultz fought to prevent law enforcement from looking at the laptop, threatening a police chief with “consequences” and implying it was “a member’s” laptop.]
Obstruction.
Awan ping ! Includes attorny-client privilege claim.
The Paki scam quickly exploded into:
<><> (A) multiple charges of conspiracy against the United States of America,
<><>(B) double-billing Congress,
<><> (C) placing ghost employees on the govt payroll,
<><> (D) stealing govt issue electronics,
<><>(E) submitting falsified documents to the US govt,
<><> (F) multiple mortgage scams,
<><>(G) shady wire transfers to Pakistan, and,
<><>(H) fleecing the Congressional bank...resulting in Imran's July 2017 arrest on bank fraud charges.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.