Skip to comments.
Climate Scientists Watch Their Words, Hoping To Stave Off Funding Cuts
National Public Radio (NPR) ^
| November 29, 2017
| by Rebecca Hersher
Posted on 11/29/2017 8:53:54 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Science has become a contest for grant money. Finding truth is not even a priority anymore.
21
posted on
11/29/2017 9:43:14 AM PST
by
Bryanw92
(Asking a pro athlete for political advice is like asking a cavalry horse for tactical advice.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Climate proctologists...
...pull your heads out!
22
posted on
11/29/2017 9:46:44 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
To: Maceman
The things one learns on FR -- I had no idea hunters add urine as bait in order to attract federal dollars. After infrastructure worked so well, no limit on imaginative language.
Undocumented workers instead of welfare frauds.
23
posted on
11/29/2017 9:57:44 AM PST
by
itsahoot
(As long as there is money to be divided, there will be division.)
To: Maceman
I had no idea hunters add urine as bait in order to attract federal dollars. LOL! I agree, very poorly written!
And I gotta check the expiration date on my doe urine-- I may have to buy some more before the rut this season!
24
posted on
11/29/2017 9:57:48 AM PST
by
backwoods-engineer
( DJT won; we got Gorsuch and a bit of MAGA. Civil war before we get more?)
To: headstamp 2
"In the scientific community, we're very cautious people,"...That caught my eye also. Utter tripe.
25
posted on
11/29/2017 10:04:39 AM PST
by
ex91B10
To: Oldeconomybuyer
I suggest that people start using the more scientifically correct phrase,
Solar Induced Climate Self-Adjustment
To: Buffalo Bob
For the Trump administration, this presents an opportunity to cut ALL funding for climate change.
“Yes, the climate changes. No need to spend billions for you to tell us that. Funding over.” Or, the administration can do the right thing and demand that the NSF present their findings within 30 days or lose all funding. In addition, the “opposition” can present their findings.
Let’s really find out what is going on.
27
posted on
11/29/2017 10:15:29 AM PST
by
EQAndyBuzz
(BANNON YOU MAGNIFICENT BASTARD!)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Please completely remove all public funding for climate science. It is a fraud.
JoMa
28
posted on
11/29/2017 10:19:01 AM PST
by
joma89
To: Oldeconomybuyer
To: Oldeconomybuyer
If “climate change” is “settled science” supported by consensus, then why is further research necessary?
30
posted on
11/29/2017 11:37:34 AM PST
by
Ceebass
To: Oldeconomybuyer; 100American; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; ...
To: Oldeconomybuyer
32
posted on
11/29/2017 1:54:01 PM PST
by
FreedomPoster
(Islam delenda est)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Four other climate researchers acknowledged that they had personally removed the term "climate change" from funding proposals or public summaries in the last year, or had advised graduate students who had done so. All were concerned that if they disclosed their names, it could negatively impact their future funding competitiveness. Too late, a******s! You can't purge the entire internet.
Boo freaking Hoo Hoo!
Nameless Climate Change "Experts" can be safely ignored.
Named "Climate Change "experts" can be verified for previous names.
Both google and wikipedia are great!
Ha ha freaking HA!
33
posted on
11/29/2017 2:49:56 PM PST
by
publius911
(CBS: "Asking the right questions is 100% of catching sexual abusers")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
