Read it yourself, again.
"Anomaly: Blame apparatus, set aside problem, modify paradigm." Sounds pretty dysfunctional to me, and therefore not what Toulmin had in mind.
papertyger. " Bear in mind I’m only asking because I’m provisionally giving you credit in hoping you’ll have a real answer rather than 'begging the question' by simply positing Toulmin is right and Kuhn is wrong. "
Yet again you project views on me I never expressed, or quacked, as the case may be.
In fact, I don't doubt that both are right in different circumstances.
Kuhn describes a more chaotic, dysfunctional & unconscious "revolutionary" process, while Toulmin defends the honor of science by positing a more orderly & consciously directed "evolutionary" process.
I think both processes are, or were, true at different times & places.
You disagree?
Quack, Quack.