Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick
But conveniently forgetting Jawaroski and starr who think it is possible to indict a sitting president

I haven't forgotten Jawarski's and Starr's POV. Doesn't mean that I agree with it.

So who do you think that the indicter of a sitting president would answer to?

RIP principles of the US Constitution.

196 posted on 11/23/2017 9:45:01 PM PST by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies ]


To: FreeReign

You dont have to agree with it. You have to acknowledge it is a valid argument that hasnt been decided

And likely won’t be this time..either


198 posted on 11/23/2017 9:46:38 PM PST by RummyChick (I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 196 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson