AL Senate President Del Marsh: Roy Moore Allegations Could Be Part of a ‘Washington Conspiracy’

Wrong. They believe the woman. He’s dropped 20 points in the polls on two weeks.

Not only that, but Trump has less than a 2% chance of winning the General Election.

Wrong. They believe the woman. He’s dropped 20 points in the polls on two weeks.

Moore has dropped, I just hope he has time to make it back to the top.

“The people in Alabama and the leadership are not only seeing through this charade but are actively speaking out about it.”

Good for them. Mitch has been silent lately for some reason.

I hope all AL Freepers see this.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/11/stepson-roy-moore-accuser-says-shes-lying-stand-behind-judge-100-video/

I did a ping to Alabama Freeper list above and I meant to add that my husban’s cousin has known Judge Roy Moore for years and he knows he is innocent of the charges.

Is there any question about that? Of course it's a political conspiracy. The timing alone is proof.
Moore should be elected. It the charges are proven to be true, he can be recalled.

However, it is prima facie obvious that this is a conspiracy for political purposes only, and the Democrats must not be allowed to get away with it.

Everyone knows that the Party of Slavery (the Democrat Party) is also the Party of Dirty Tricks.

“The allegations came in a group.”

This is literally a concise and interesting point!

The allegations, NOT EVIDENCE, came in a very tight group in *time relation*, AND ONLY AFTER the Washington Post was on the ground with a small army, obviously offering fame and fortune of some kind to some unprincipled women (in my opinion).

**A GRAPH should be created AND PUBLISHED, demonstrating this tight grouping of allegations, specifically following the INTERFERENCE FROM WASHINGTON DC, ($30,000,000 spent by McConnell for Luther Strange), the *subsequent* denial of the Alabama Republican Party’s appeal to the RNC in DC to allow voters in Alabama to chose their own elected officials, and ESPECIALLY the Washington Post hitting the ground with a small army to come up with 40 year old “allegations”!

The reason (I believe) these women are unprincipled, is because even if some of their stories were true, they obviously DID NOT come forward until nearly 40 years later, when some kind of power over a man, national fame, and fortune were offered! If they were afraid of Roy Moore, and most have remained in the same geographical area as Roy Moore all these years, they weren’t “afraid” enough of Roy Moore to get further away. As well, IF all these women were afraid of Roy Moore, you would think at least 1 or 2 would have overcome their fear, being concerned about him going after other young women - and hopefully overcome their fear to speak up to the authorities.

The fact these things did not happen, until nearly 40 years later, only after being motivated by the DC establishment and left wing Washington Post army on the ground in Alabama, does become problematic in the least.

A case in point from my own personal experience. The physical well-being and lives of my family were threatened a few years ago, after I had been asked to intervene in behalf of a Soldier who had been sexual assaulted. After my wife and another female (who knew of the assault) were subsequently sexually harassed by a Battalion CSM involved in the same investigation, I deemed it unsafe to stay, and packed my stuff up and moved my family across the country to keep them safe. Even while we had no time to work out my transfer and where we were going.

Additionally, if we are supposed to believe the “allegations” of women from 40 years ago, *WHY CAN’T WE BELIEVE the CURRENT statement (allegation) from the female who stated she was offered significant money to formulate something bad about Roy Moore?

Regardless of the legitimacy of these allegations against Roy Moore, there has been an all out effort by Washington DC establishment (which could care less about women and morality) and the Washington Post, to get a deeply immoral and murderous (late term abortionist) left wing Demoncrat to replace Roy Moore. I believe this is an effort to *halt any further conservative/Bannon efforts, and to *halt any further justices from being placed on the Supreme Court.

Of course some of the national narrative against Roy Moore has already fallen apart.

The yearbook fiasco, where there is clearly something wrong with several parts of this allegation, including a very likely forgery, or purposeful lie regarding who signed the yearbook and when.

The car lock assault allegation, which includes highly improbable driver controlled locks, a very improbable/impossible phone call timing issue, and actual geographical address problem/impossibility.

The mall story, being debunked.

The nationally circulated narrative, by media and press, that all of these allegations were made by conservative voters, when at least 2 of the allegations were by individuals who have long been active in Democratic and LGBT campaigns in Alabama and Florida.

It is clear to me, at least 3 of these are morally challenged and dishonest individuals based on the immorality they are proponents of.

SOMEONE NEEDS TO CREATE AND PUBLISH THE GRAPH!

And you believe the polls, why?

Political Polls 2016

“HILLARY CLINTON WILL BE NEXT PRESIDENT OF UNITED STATES”

Facts as they came out

“HILLARY CLINTON GETS STOMPED INTO THE MUD’

There is no recall for a member of Congress.

Maybe people in KY are solidly for Jones in AL! And McC is just doing what his constituents want.

Excerpt:

“They attack Judge Moore from Washington, the establishment – all that is doing, in my opinion, is solidifying his base,” Marsh said. “And quite honestly, as things settle down, I think you’ll see people who perhaps were on the fence also gravitate to Judge Moore versus what they perceive as a liberal Democrat.”Mr. Marsh has it exactly correct.

Judge Moore Ping!

Want on or off this ping list? Just drop me a FReep mail.

Nice roundup of the accusers and Judge Moore's responses.

Follow Judge Moore on Twitter.

I hope you are right, but this is clearly a well-organized attack on Moore. They are not about to give up this easily.

They have another liar all lined up with a “believable” story, they will parade out in front of the American public a few days before the election. The next women, will claim he actually did rape her as a teen, either forced her to perform oral sex or had intercourse against her will.

Moore will not have time to recover. The people out to get Moore will make sure the next story doesn’t have a forged signature in a yearbook or any obvious holes. The next story will not only have a paid liar, but friends of hers from 40 years ago will support the story, say they remember vividly their friend confiding in them. They suggested she keep quiet because he worked in the D.A.s office. They will make sure, it’s a very convincing story.

If they have paid these other women to lie, it won’t stop now. It’s been a gradual progression - from kissing, then a women talked about being forced to touch him through his underwear and then the next one said he grabbed her by the neck and head, tried to force her onto his crotch. The logical next liar will be talking about a rape.

We sure have. People are speaking loudly and clearly. I have been surprised at the number on FB. Many have said we do not need any advice from others.

“The anatomy of a political hit job.”

Someone could make some money with a book documenting this fiasco.

Thought your post was remarkable.

We are in total agreement regarding this BS.

doug jones = great American?

Oh nevermind, I just checked what state you’re from.

Wrong. You choose to believe the fake polls.

Don’t be so gullible.

I want to thank you for including me on your ping list and sending that link.

"I would hope a lesson would be learned,” he said.
“You know, the people of Alabama –
they don’t like others telling them what to do.
People are smart enough to listen to all the facts and make an educated decision about the facts.
I think the more Washington pushed – including President Trump –
I mean, President Trump is really popular here in Alabama,
but people do not like even the president telling them who to vote for.
And that showed.
It showed in the election in which Moore won the Republican primary.
And I think if Washington keeps up with what it’s doing
and if the press keeps up what it’s doing
that will do nothing but solidify Moore’s base
and ultimately I think keeps Republicans voting Republican.” "

I agree !

Read this:

IT’S A FAKE! Analyst Says Judge Roy Moore Signature Inside Gloria Allred Accuser’s Yearbook Was FORGED The sevens in 1977 to the right of “Christmas,” are very different from the sevens in the date (12-22-77) above “Old Hickory House.” “Look at the two versions of the number “7,” tweeted Wictor. “”12-22-77” and “Olde Hickory House” were written by a different person,” he added. Next, [Thomas] Wictor points out “the “R” and “y” in “Roy,”” are not written the same way. The inflection of the “Y” is more pronounced in Moore’ signature as Chief Justice. The “R” is noticeably longer in the signature of Chief Justice, as well. “During his legal career, Judge Moore became the first full-time Deputy District Attorney in Etowah County, Alabama, and served in this position from 1977 until 1982. In 1984, Judge Moore undertook private practice of law in Gadsden, Alabama,” states Moore’s bio on his campaign website. “The accuser to this day calls him the District Attorney. He was NEVER District attorney. He was DEPUTY DA. DDA,” says Wictor. ... "

Check out this little fact from TheCipher

Interesting revelation about the signature in the yearbook and where it probably came from. Turns out Moore was the judge who ruled against Nelson in her divorce case and the signature is exactly how it was on his ruling - explains the D.A. ( which Nelson has ). Nelson also said she never had contact with him since the "incident"and failed to mention he was the judge in her divorce case.Roy Moore Attorney Demands Gloria Allred Release Original Yearbook, Contends it’s a ‘Fraud’ " ... "D.A." (District Attorney) initials after Moore’s signature, was recognized by Moore as the initials that his then-assistant, Deborah Adams , used to sign documents. ... "

From "TigerClaws" :

" ... But (exhibit 2) click on the image in the link.
You can clearly see two different color ink pens were used.

https://mobile.twitter.com/CNN/status/930205088299257859

Here's that image and a link to its ORIGINAL source :

And here’s one more source:

Live Stream: Moore Campaign Holding Press Conference

stamped his signature on papers and then put "D.A." on them

That's the THIRD Spelling of his assistant.

WHICH ONE IS CORRECT ?

Check out this little fact from TheCipher

Interesting revelation about the signature in the yearbook and where it probably came from. Turns out Moore was the judge who ruled against Nelson in her divorce case and the signature is exactly how it was on his ruling - explains the D.A. ( which Nelson has ). Nelson also said she never had contact with him since the "incident"and failed to mention he was the judge in her divorce case.Roy Moore Attorney Demands Gloria Allred Release Original Yearbook, Contends it’s a ‘Fraud’ " ... "D.A." (District Attorney) initials after Moore’s signature, was recognized by Moore as the initials that his then-assistant, Deborah Adams , used to sign documents. ... "

Here’s one more source:

Embattled GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore's attorney implies his signature in a girl's high school yearbook was a forgery

Delver Adams

And here’s a link to a DIFFERENT SPELLING of that name:

Roy Moore Campaign to Gloria Allred: Release the Evidence to Determine Whether There is Fraud " … “Judge Moore says he can’t remember ever signing his name with DA after it. But he had seen it before. You know where he had seen it ? When he was on the bench, his assistant whose initials are capital D. A. Delbra Adams would stamp his signature on a document and put capital D. A. That’s exactly how this signature appears on the divorce decree that Judge Moore signed dismissing the divorce action of Beverly Nelson.” … "

The more I search those different spellings of the assistant's name, the more I'm inclined to believe it was Delbra Adams.
I get results for a Court Specialist at State of Alabama Circuit Clerk's Office Cherokee County.
I also get results as a certified public notary located in Sand Rock, AL.
And ... I get results for Delbra Adams in Leesburg , AL. with a lot of A.K.A.s

Debra L Adams, Delbra M Adams, Debbie Adams, Debra Ly Adams, Delbra L Adams, Debble Adams, Debra Adams, Delbra Lynn Adams, Delbra L Admas

" "

Duh !

Here's an excerpt from Rush Limbaugh's Radio Show:

The Swamp Demands Conformity Nov 15, 2017 ... RUSH: Here’s Mark in Port Townsend — where’s Port Townsend ? Port Townsend what? CALLER: That’s a little bit west of Seattle. RUSH: In Washington. Okay. Great to have you with us. How you doing, sir ? CALLER: I’m doing great, sir. I hope you’re doing well yourself. RUSH: I am under siege today, Mark. I’m under siege. The Drive-By Media is after me because I dared to point out that Roy Moore used to be a Democrat. CALLER: That’s why you get paid the big bucks. I’m envious of you. RUSH: (laughing). CALLER: So the comment I wanted to make was that as a retired law enforcement officer, Jeff Sessions — I’m speaking as a retired law enforcement officer — Jeff Sessions says he doesn’t see any reason to doubt these girls’ word. Well, I see a really good reason. None of these girls have been put under oath and made a sworn statement under penalty of perjury. And Gloria Allred should be able to tell you that is the first thing you do when you get a client, you depose them and you get their statement on the record, and then you go from there. And if they’re not willing to make a sworn statement, that sounds really fishy to me. RUSH: I take it you don’t believe the women or you just don’t have enough information yet to make a determination ? CALLER: You don’t have enough information to make a determination, but speaking as an ex-cop, I find it fishy that nobody has made a sworn statement. And about that yearbook thing,you know, when I was in uniform at a certain time of year you’d get kids walking up to you all the time wanting you to sign their yearbook.“Hey, Officer Mark, sign my yearbook.” And I was only a cop. Can you imagine how politicians get kids wanting — doesn’t mean you remember all of them. RUSH: Hang on. On the yearbook stuff, folks, for those of you who may not be up to speed on this —and I doubt there are very many of you — there are allegations that some of these autographs in yearbooks are forged. There are conservative blog sites claiming to have evidence by virtue of side-by-side comparison that somebody other than Judge Moore signed some of these things. This is the first I’ve mentioned that. I’m just reacting to you bringing up the yearbooks. You’re upset with Jeff Sessions. He’s the attorney general, and he is going ahead and acknowledging thathe believes witnesses before anybody’s been put under oath, and you think that’s a little unprofessional, right ? CALLER: It sounds to me like he’s just trying to tread carefully. RUSH: Well, look, this is politics. It has its own court, and it’s not a court of law. CALLER: But these girls are making public statements — RUSH: They are women. They are women. CALLER: Okay, they’re making public statements impugning somebody’s honor. And somebody with responsibility needs to explain to them,if you’re gonna besmirch somebody, you gotta put it on the record. RUSH: No, you don’t. Only in court. And this is not in court. This is in politics. CALLER: I understand it’s politics, but Gloria Allred should know what the law is. RUSH: I’m sure she does. That’s why she’s not in court and is instead on TV. CALLER: I just want to make that point, Rush. Thank you. RUSH: I’m glad you called, Mark. Folks, I have to tell you,I’m having a little fun with this. No, don’t misunderstand here, but he’s exactly right, but of course that doesn’t —there’s a whole different inertia and movement now that is taking place in the world of politics, and there is no room for doubt. I mean,the guy did it, you don’t disbelieve the women. I mean, that’s something you must subscribe to now.The women don’t lie,except if you’re Juanita Broaddrick, then of course… that’s the point. BREAK TRANSCRIPT RUSH: I was having fun with the caller and his obvious consternationby confusing what happens in politics with what happens in the law,which is ironic, because the laws are written by these people. But what happens thereapparently the law doesn’t matter first and foremost. Find it funny. BREAK TRANSCRIPT RUSH: Steve in Rochester, Minnesota. Great to have you with us, sir. How are you ? CALLER: Hey, good. Thanks, Rush. Dittos. I’ve been listening since 1991. So I was reading through a Fox News story on the various senators,Republican senators and their comments about this whole situation, and I read read ’em one after another; there were many. And I was thinking as I got most of the way through it,this sounds a lot like your media montages, vis-a-vis gravitas, that I often hear on your show. The similarities were striking in what they said. And it was an observation that led me to think thatthis is really a coordinated attack. And I think that should be the focus, not the “he said, she said,” but the fact thatthis guy’s being attacked by the establishment, big time. RUSH: Let me put it to you another way in the form of a question. Interesting observation, by the way, that you,in reading and listening to all of the different people opposing Judge Moore, they’re all saying the same thing, is that your point ? Just like when Cheney was mentioned as the potential vice presidential nominee for George W. Bush, about 85 media people all said,“That’s gravitas. This is to provide gravitas.” They all had that word. You think the same thing’s happening here with the response to Judge Moore ? CALLER: Yes. Exactly. RUSH: Okay. So do you think —let me just ask you point-blank — do you think that, whether he did it or not, he’s being railroaded ? CALLER: Yes. RUSH: Interesting. CALLER: Yep. I think this is a coordinated attack, and what spurred me to think thiswas your comments yesterday about Mitch McConnell attacking Bannon’s choice. And I thoughthow else could you do this ? Here we are a month away from the election. RUSH: Let me tell you something. I don’t think there’s any doubt here. When Bannon went public and said thatJudge Moore was the first of many candidates they’re gonna support in order to oust the Republican leadership, I don’t think there’s any question here that McConnell’s reacting to that. Let me just ask you this.Have any of you ever, do you ever remember Mitch McConnell or the Republican leadership ever going after a Democrat the way they’re going after — (interruption) You don’t remember. You don’t remember McConnell ever going after a Democrat the way they’re going after …