Posted on 11/16/2017 4:02:01 AM PST by blueyon
"""BREAKING: Wolf Blitzer Repeatedly Asks Gloria Allred if the Yearbook Signature is a Forgery ALLRED REFUSES TO ANSWER! (VIDEO)"""
Embattled Attorney Gloria Allred, who is well known for trotting out women to confess to phony crimes against conservatives, held a press conference on Monday afternoon. Allred and her client accused Judge Roy Moore of attempted rape in 1977. Allred and her client brought a yearbook with them to use as evidence during their press conference. The signature was signed in two different colored inks. Allred was a Hillary delegate at the DNC in 2016. Allred is also under TWO INVESTIGATIONS for misconduct as an attorney.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
You heard about the Democrat who locked her family in the car? She had to use a coathanger to get them out.
... I thought it was a convertible
Also thinking....did they really have a dumpster behind the Olde Hickory House....way back then??
Something wrong with the timing.
Would like to ask the brother if there was a relative or family friend with the name Ray or Roy.
In the meantime, Allred has left the room and is back with the Weinstein....where she is guaranteed some really big bucks.
I also got the impression from something I read that Allred was originally going to represent the 14 year old.
CNN tried to get around that by posting the copy in black and white:
If she graduated in 1977, why does she have her Yearbook signed in December? Makes no sense.
More importantly...It's what the note says. It is not neutral which is what Moore would have written. This was written by an uncle/aunt/cousin/old family friend/teacher who visited the Corfman home on Dec 22 1977...just before Christmas.....someone who had known her from when she was a little girl. She brought the book out for "someone" and they signed it.
Moore would have written..."Best wishes in all your future endeavors. Roy Moore
But in reality....it's just plain stupid that he would have signed the book in the first place and more ridiculous that she brought the book to work....6 or 7 months after getting it. Mine was in the attic by that time.
She was in the same class as Moore's wife and they're the same age.
There’s something seriously wrong here - if this document were authentic that would prove, definitively, that Roy Moore is a liar and give credence to her client’s allegations (after all, if he would lie so forcefully about even knowing her, he could be lying about other things as well). So why not allow it to immediately be authenticated? There has to be a reason for it. Either it is a forgery and that would undermine this entire narrative and indicate at least this accuser was a liar and forging documents to smear him...or she isn’t sure and she purely wants to keep this “hanging out there” through the duration of the election to either prevent him from winning with a false smear, or prevent him from dropping out and allowing a replacement candidate. Either way the motive is purely about electing the Democrat...otherwise they would immediately allow this document to be reviewed, because there is absolutely no legitimate reason not to.
And why would you add “Olde Hickory House” to a signature?
Who is Ray?
I wonder that, too. A real reporter would try to find someone named Ray or Roy who went to that school and could possibly have signed the yearbook. It's what the Dems would do....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.