Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roy Moore announces 12 testimonials from women affirming his character
al.com ^ | Nov 15, 2017 | Paul Gattis

Posted on 11/15/2017 6:15:24 PM PST by upchuck

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

1 posted on 11/15/2017 6:15:24 PM PST by upchuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Read this:
2 posted on 11/15/2017 6:15:47 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
Here's an excerpt from Rush Limbaugh's Radio Show:
3 posted on 11/15/2017 6:16:10 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 5th MEB; Art in Idaho; blueyon; ColdOne; Fiddlstix; heshtesh; House Atreides; I got the rope; ...
Anything you can do, I can do better. I can do anything better than you.

You got 5, I got 12!


Judge Moore Ping!

Want on or off this ping list? Just drop me a FReep mail.

Follow Judge Moore on Twitter.

4 posted on 11/15/2017 6:17:13 PM PST by upchuck (You know why there's a second Amendment? In case the gvt fails to follow the first one. ~ Rush L.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

A full 40 years ago. Rolls eyes...


5 posted on 11/15/2017 6:18:00 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

If only Moore had limited himself to circulating through the bath-houses of Chicago.

I know of one guy who high school girls say was not interested in women.

Perhaps the right should dumpster dive on that fella.

Nah, Moore is a heterosexual male. He was interested in women. He actually dated them.

By all accounts but one I’ve seen so far, he participated in activity that included petting and accepting limits when the women laid them down.

In my early 30s I once purchased some shoes at a mall shoe store. The young woman that waited on me was cute.

I had nearly left the store when I thought, what the heck. I went back and asked her if she would like to go out to dinner with me after she was off. She said yes.

We had a nice dinner in Westwood, California at Chuck’s Steakhouse. Alan Alda and his wife were eating at the next table, about three feet from ours.

Yes folks, it was an unwanted approach. She hadn’t told me I had permission before I asked.

It’s called dating. Evidently globalists don’t get around much.


6 posted on 11/15/2017 6:26:04 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
DemocRATS digging for dirt on ex-DemocRAT ... "who'd uh thunk it" ?(hehehehehe)
7 posted on 11/15/2017 6:27:10 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
The Birmingham News has been on a rampage against Judge Roy Moore for many years, especially since their alleged lesbian editor took over as the main editor for the 3 largest newspapers in the state of Alabama and Judge Moore came out against sodomite marriage.

Kyle Whitmire is an effete "columnist" there (though he's married, he's still a wuss) and he's written with more vitriol against Judge Moore than anyone, with the possible exception of John "I forgot I declared bankruptcy and I've got a gay brother" Archibald.

They hate Judge Moore and they have made it clear that they do.

abc

One is simply not allowed to be a Christian or speak in churches in Alabama by the bigots at the Birmingham News.

That's the real story, that the lesbians and leftists are trashing Judge Moore because of his stand for traditional marriage.

That's why this fight matters.

8 posted on 11/15/2017 6:27:50 PM PST by Bodleian_Girl (Luther Strange was dirty then, he's dirty now http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3587879/posts?p)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
I don't believe any of these women at all, at all. What confirmed it to me was this fraud Beverly Young Nelson claiming she is 56. There is NO damn way that woman is 56. I'm 55, I know what 56 looks like, my sister and wife are 53 and they agree with me, this Beverly Young Nelson is in her mid 60s at least, I'm guessing in her 70s. So if she is lying about her age like that, her credibility is ZIP and what that means is this is all a setup. Look at Gloria Allred who is 76 and compare her face to this Beverly Young Nelson. They look exactly the same age. This woman is LIAR.

And BTW, in every yearbook I ever seen the students are in alphabetical order, and why do these photos look like they are pasted on?


9 posted on 11/15/2017 6:28:04 PM PST by GrandJediMasterYoda (Trump: Greatest POTUS of all time solely for preventing Satan from taking office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

If the Moore saga doesn’t show us how powerful the media actually still is, nothing will. It’s the same playbook that they use against President Trump. There are a lot of stupid people out there that will believe the media and believe whatever they are spoon feed by Hollyweird, Silicon Valley and the MSM. We have to figure out a way to utterly destroy the stranglehold that these people have on the country.


10 posted on 11/15/2017 6:31:14 PM PST by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Yes, Rush has been mentioning that daily. What a hoot.

Globalists have go back 38 years to find dirt on Moore. It amounts to little more than dating.

While there are some questionable things mentioned, the tails seem to have some fiction included. That’s not a very good thing when you want folks to believe you.


11 posted on 11/15/2017 6:32:18 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
This is great! I hope Roy Moore keeps them coming. And these ladies should get together, email or fax the pages of testimonial to various news organizations who have published the bad stuff and then call them - one by one, saying "Hey, we're women saying something about Judge Roy Moore. Are you going publish one side only or our side as well?" Then call local radio stations the next day and be interviewed explaining how they refused to publish.

They should also call the offices of McConnell and his band of RINO idiots demanding to speak to the Senators. Fax those testimonials over and confirm they've received them.
12 posted on 11/15/2017 6:34:05 PM PST by \/\/ayne (I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Satan always mixes some truth with his lies ... so as to call into question ...EVERYTHING .


13 posted on 11/15/2017 6:35:08 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's SIMPLE ! ... Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Agreed.

His best known one, was when he promised Eve her eyes would be opened. Sure enough, fig leaves were the rage that fall fashion season.


14 posted on 11/15/2017 6:38:16 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

There is a reason for statute of limitations. It is almost impossible to prove/disprove an allegation from 40 years ago.


15 posted on 11/15/2017 6:38:46 PM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20

It’s always impossible to prove a negative, unless you can nail down an alibi.

At 40 years later, it’s a joke for a guy to have to answer to certain things. None the less, I don’t want to deny any woman her chance at justice. Here the level of the things they are charging are so minimal and unproven, that it’s good the SoL has run.

Even a suspect should have a fair shot at a reasonable process. 40 years later? No.

If it’s rape, I don’t care how long it has been, as long as it can be proven.


16 posted on 11/15/2017 6:46:04 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Agreed, she looks much older than 56. Those yearbook photos definitely look like they could be pasted on. Every yearbook I’ve seen has several rows of photos, in alphabetical order, and without other photos in the background.


17 posted on 11/15/2017 6:48:13 PM PST by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Therein lies the problem. Even rapes committed recently are hard to prove/disprove, crimes from 40 years ago are that much harder. It often comes down to a he said/she said type of thing even if it happened last month. I have a couple of friends who spent months in jail after being accused of rape. The woman recanted before the trial but the experience ended up negatively impacting both of their lives. As terrible as rape is, falsely accusing somebody of it is even worse in my view.


18 posted on 11/15/2017 6:53:29 PM PST by jospehm20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20

It has long been my opinion, that if a woman is found to have lied, she should serve the same sentence the man she accused would have had to serve if he had been found guilty.

Further, if he can demonstrate a loss of respect and income, she should be exposed to a civil suit of substantial cost to her, restoring his normal expected earnings that he lost out on.

That’s pretty hard to quantify, because who knows what promotions he may have lost out on, because he was passed over due to the hanging charges.


19 posted on 11/15/2017 7:01:04 PM PST by DoughtyOne (McConnell / Ryan: Why pass Cons legislation when we can pass Leftist legislation for Leftists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

Having character witnesses does not mean he is innocent of the alleged inappropriate behavior.


20 posted on 11/15/2017 7:04:46 PM PST by DennisR (Look around - God gives countless, indisputable clues that He does, indeed, exist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson