Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Enlightened1

2 posted on 11/15/2017 5:01:39 PM PST by Enlightened1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Enlightened1

Maybe Sean should focus on cleaning up his past. And instead of piling on others


6 posted on 11/15/2017 5:05:56 PM PST by Reno89519 (PRESIDENT TRUMP, KEEP YOUR PROMISES! NO AMNESTY AND BUILD THAT WALL.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Thank you. This is the kind of defense I’ve been waiting for from him.

There are now 6 women. Three of them do not allege anything improper.

One has made this kind of accusation before against numerous other people, and is not credible.

One, her step son says is not credible.

The last one, we’ll soon find out who she is and what her story is. But if out of three accusations, 2 of them are crumbling, I will not be surprised if the last one crumbles too.

Moore is the only guy I can remember in my life who has resigned high office rather than do something he considered immoral. And he did it twice.


7 posted on 11/15/2017 5:06:45 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Excellent. Will watch Hannity tonight to see how he responds.


8 posted on 11/15/2017 5:07:56 PM PST by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Blue Jays

Have not yet viewed Twitter tonight, yet that is confident and forceful.

11 posted on 11/15/2017 5:08:49 PM PST by Blue Jays ( Rock hard ~ Ride free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

The part about her divorce being in front of him is devastating to her credibility.


23 posted on 11/15/2017 5:19:04 PM PST by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

This is more like it and should have been done days ago..His original interview with Hannity did not serve him well. Also Judge Moore should have been more specific in terms of declaring the civil action against numerous parties and perhaps named them and the types of action and redress he seeks. Play fire with fire. He should have forcibly stated that he wants those people in a court of law to testify against penalty of perjury and face the legal ramifications of said perjury and that he will update the list as appropriate. He needs to include the source of the mall story, etc...that is killing him on Social Media. He needs to go further with this statement in my opinion, otherwise he will not be able to turn around the court of opinion that has him in a close race (notwithstanding the NRSC poll, which is a false narrative on purpose.)

I hear yet another whack-a-mole appeared today.


25 posted on 11/15/2017 5:20:04 PM PST by abigkahuna (How can you be at two places at once when you are nowhere at all?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Enlightened1

Atta boy, Roy!


50 posted on 11/16/2017 5:35:57 AM PST by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson