Read it more carefully, according to the article, parents were not worried about illegal immigrants being there with their little ones. They were more worried about danger posed by those against illegal immigration, there might be retaliation through destruction of property.
So much projection of assumed guilt and predicted crimes.
That’s what they said. To keep their PC creds in Boulder, once described by a speaker as “a city surrounded by the United States.”
There are three concerns expressed in the article, but the last is (probably intentionally) subordinated to the first and second.
1. “...the church is doing civil disobedience and there is nothing legal about it. If that’s a risk the church wants to take, that’s fine, but they are roping our kids into it. I feel like that was unacceptable.”
2. “They were concerned about people against the idea of sanctuary doing something to the location. It was more outside concern.”
3. “...some parents had concerns about how people taking sanctuary at the church would be vetted.”
Another item...”[the congregation] voted to move forward with plans to outfit a portion of the building to provide living quarters.”
I wonder if it’ll be properly designed and lawfully permitted. Liberals always following zoning regulations and laws.