“Not enough evidence to investigate” means that he stalled long enough for it to be destroyed.
Or better yet, “they” stalled long enough.
Here eMails alone provided substantial evidence to start up to five investigations. I don’t remember them all now, but at one point I could touch on them all.
Lets see:
1. placing classified information on one or more unauthorized private servers or computers
2. sending classified information to a private insecure unauthorized device
3. other violations of federal laws about how classified information are to be handled
4. taking funds from entities she had the power to benefit directly with her government position
5. misusing charitable funds for personal use
6. urging major entities to help her husband make money
7. accepting unreasonable amounts of fees for speaking engagements, no reasoned person would pay unless they wanted something in return
8. paying for her daughter’s wedding out of foundation funds, if true
I’m sure I’m leaving a lot out...
The thing is, these eMail dumps were/are a treasure trove of information that the FBI or Justice Department had/have access to without breaking the law to obtain it.
Cases are made and prosecuted on this sorts of information all the time. This is why the FBI and Justice Department confiscate computers in the first place.
If there is no evidence here, then there is no evidence ever in cases that are derived from private personal information.
The woman is on the record lying over and over and over again.
She claimed for years that Benghazi was all about an internet video. She lied to everyone about it.