[mosesdapoet]

ever Trumpers and drive by media radio talk hosts are having a field day ignoring the fact that all of the accusers were of the age of legal consent. Including the one claiming when 14 years old. For her accusations are the juiciest. Which they gleefully relate and dwell on in a touchy feel-ly manner as if it came off of a police report yesterday. Not as a unsubstantiated recollection from 40 years ago. Because they know these are damaging accusations which will be almost impossible to disprove.

Despite that fact that it has been uncovered that two of his accusers are working for the Perversion Party and that their accusations are false and politically motivated. The drivebys and the nevers media are not reporting this but are mentioning one accuser is a “Republican” .

Here is background on two accusers. One works for the perverts that one knows the one who claimed she was 14. But was actually 17 at the time? http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3603606/posts
Latest charge : Grad book signature a forgery; http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3604591/posts
someone named Roy signed it Moore’s last name was added to it.

[Political Junkie Too]

someone named Roy signed it Moore’s last name was added to it.

If I'm seeing the unretouched photo in the handwriting analysis tweet correctly...

...it looks like somebody named "Roy" signed the book with a black ink pen, and then somebody added "Moore" and the rest with a blue ink pen?

-PJ

[JudgemAll]

Yes, the accuser being half right and half truthful is basically warranting everything out of the accuser. This is utmost bull sht. They can lie

[MayflowerMadam]

“someone named Roy signed it Moore’s last name was added to it.”

And “Moore” was in a different colored ink. Pretty transparent, really. Like those silly excuse notes elementary kids write to their teachers supposedly from their parents.