Posted on 11/12/2017 4:40:57 AM PST by Alas Babylon!
The Talk Shows
Nov 12th, 2017
Guests to be interviewed today on major television talk shows:
FOX NEWS SUNDAY (Fox Network): Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas; Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.
MEET THE PRESS (NBC): White House legislative director Marc Short; Sens. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., and Amy Klobuchar, D-Minn.
FACE THE NATION (CBS): Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin; Sens. Tim Scott, R-S.C., and Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.
THIS WEEK (ABC): Tom Perez, Democratic National Committee chairman; Gov. John Kasich, R-Ohio.
STATE OF THE UNION (CNN): Mnuchin; Kasich; Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.; James Clapper, former director of national intelligence; John Brennan, former CIA director.
So now I'll repose my single question:
Who's going to charge him....Sessions?
(obviously not)
Silly boy, I never said that Trump didn't know about it, when obviously he does. I guess you must have missed his recent tweets begging anyone at the DoJ to quote "DO SOMETHING!" about it which clearly re-enforces the belief, and the law don't forget, that Mueller is operating independently from the President.
We never needed a special council and once again for you slo-types, if we know that, Trump knows that. So if he is OK with Mueller being the one than "he has a reason"! Stop trying to second guess the President of the U.S. who is one hell of a lot smarter than you.
Au contraire my young friend, I am clearly the one taking the President for his word, as he said from the very beginning that he believes Mueller's investigation is quote "witch hunt" and should be shut down. Just yesterday he said that it is a "Democratic hit job" and that "people will die" because of rising tensions with Russia.
You're the one calling the President a liar, not me. And I'm the one that also agrees with the President that a new and separate investigation needs to be done of the Clintons, not given over to Mueller and his band of Clinton/Obama cronies. Or do you not know about the composition of Mueller's staff, either? Surely you couldn't, considering your strong support of their operation?
Your answer was in the very first sentence of the my post. Obviously you didn’t get that far LOL. No surprise.
Well bless your little heart.
Hopefully you got it that time. If not let me know.
Yes, could you please start again from the beginning, maybe even posting the transcripts from all the hearings, the particular Hannity show, and the exact language of Sessions recusing himself from everything, and anything else pertinent that you think we need to be made aware of.
I'm sure we would all appreciate as much intricate detail as possible. Take all night if you need to.
Thank you so much.
Rock
OK, this is the first sentence of your post:
>>I’ve covered this before endlessly, including most of it again on this thread, but here it is just for you.<<
Funny...I just don't see any answer in there.
According to two of his own separate testimonies to Congress, Sessions has recused himself. Hat tip to other FReepers who originally posted the transcripts some time ago:
GRASSLEY: OK. I think, that’s — let me emphasize then with a follow up question. To be very clear, you intend to recuse yourself from both the Clinton e-mail investigation and any matters involving the Clinton Foundation, if there are any?
SESSIONS: Yes.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3601510/posts?page=70#70
CHAIRMAN GRASSLEY:
WHAT ARE YOU DOING TO FIND OUT HOW THE RUSSIAN TAKEOVER OF THE AMERICAN URANIUM WAS ALLOWED TO OCCUR, DESPITE CRIMINAL CONDUCT BY THE RUSSIAN COMPANY THAT THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION APPROVED TO MAKE THE PURCHASE?
A.G. SESSIONS:
MR. CHAIRMAN, WE WILL HEAR YOUR CONCERNS. THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE WILL TAKE SUCH ACTIONS AS IS APPROPRIATE, I KNOW, AND I WOULD OFFER THAT SOME PEOPLE HAVE GONE TO JAIL IN THAT TRANSACTION ALREADY, BUT THE ARTICLE TALKS ABOUT OTHER ISSUES.
SO WITHOUT CONFIRMING OR DENYING THE EXISTENCE OF ANY PARTICULAR INVESTIGATION, I WOULD SAY THAT I HEAR YOUR CONCERNS AND THEY WILL BE REVIEWED.
CHAIRMAN GRASSLEY:
I THINK I KNOW WHY YOU ARE PROBABLY RELUCTANT TO GO INTO SOME DETAIL ON THAT, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO REMIND YOU THAT DEPUTY ATTORNEY ROSENSTEIN DIRECTLY SUPERVISED A CRIMINAL CASE WHEN HE WAS U.S. ATTORNEY IN MARYLAND.
I DO NOT THINK IT WOULD BE PROPER FOR HIM TO SUPERVISE A REVIEW OF HIS OWN CONDUCT, DO YOU?
A.G. SESSIONS:
IT WOULD BE HIS DECISION.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3601510/posts?page=15#15
Here's something in the THIRD sentence:
Sessions said any decision on this would be left up to Deputy AG Rosenstein
But we all know that ain't gonna happen, is it.
Then you went on to say:
despite Grassley’s concern that Rosenstein is potentially implicated in the uranium scandal, and should be recused as well.
Well hell, then he's out the window too. Hmmmmm...
I'm just not seeing it. Maybe you accidentally deleted "the first sentence" that you wanted us to see.
Our condolences for your loss
Correct, second sentence. My mistake, obviously. Still right at the very top.
I see you’re only interested in talking in circles now, so count me out. Maybe if you and your buddies print this all out and have a study session at one of your apartments you can maybe put it all together, and actually start taking Trump and Sessions for their word. Or, you can just spill beer all over it and continue to spread your baseless conspiracies. Later.
______________________________________________________________
I DO NOT THINK IT WOULD BE PROPER FOR HIM TO SUPERVISE A REVIEW OF HIS OWN CONDUCT, DO YOU?
A.G. SESSIONS:
IT WOULD BE HIS DECISION.
OH, So then nobody is going to charge him. That must be what you're saying.
But then that yanks the rug out from under your own position.
Third sentence.
No no no, I was only responding to your quotes, each and every time.
so count me out
Come back here you coward.
Somebody has to charge Mueller, it isn't Sessions and it isn't Rosenstein...so WTF?
Since Rod asked that I not address/reply to his Posts a few month back, I no longer read his musings. Like you, I too believe that Rod puts on the Tinfoil had a bit too often.
As for Mueller and the rest of the FBI top echelon - Yes, they are the deep swamp and are doing all they can to protect themselves. It will indeed take The Donald well into his second term to clean up the FBI
Once again he's just another wannabe idiot who underestimates Trump like most do. HOpefully he will stay on the argue and fight all the time threads and keep out of here.
Where’s Golden Shower Boy? I was just getting warmed up.
Come back here and defend your position.
This thread used to be about the Sunday morning talk shows, but they have become unwatchable so we discuss all types of issues. We often break news before the lamestream media and conservative news does.
There is just nothing to discuss about the Sunday shows.
Well, we could always talk about the camera work. Maybe the quality of the graphics, how attractive the guests appear, technical details.....(If we wanted to)
Tucker might take a look at it... He senses something’s odd about how it’s been handled...
Week after week you start us off with some brilliant comments and we pick up the ball after that. When we get posters who are responsible for getting rid of brilliant guys like yourself or in this case LS and they come here to disrupt the thread its time to fight back. That's what I did. Check you later gotta go to work.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.