Posted on 11/10/2017 8:19:50 PM PST by ForYourChildren
A woman who alleges that she engaged in a legal and consensual but inappropriate relationship with Republican senatorial candidate Roy Moore has deleted multiple political postings from her Facebook page.
Some of those postings by Deborah Wesson Gibson were critical of Moore while one was related to Moores Democratic opponent, Doug Jones.
One posting shows a picture of Gibson with Vice President Joe Biden and says that she did work for him in 2012. One older version of that image is still on her page while another more recent posting of that same image in response to a posting from Joness official campaign Facebook page was removed, but was captured by Breitbart News.
Reached by Breitbart News, Gibson said that she has no comment on the removals of her Facebook posts.
Other posts still active on her page repeatedly urge the immediate removal of President Donald Trump from office and show that Gibson likes far-left activist groups. She also pushed a petition drive to remove Steve Bannon from the National Security Council last February when Bannon was serving as the White House chief strategist.
{..snip..}
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
this woman’s language clearly identifies her as a political pro.
WaPo couldn’t check the rubbish the writer gave them?
what a set-up. keep digging folks.
I keep on hearing Dana PeRINO yapping about it!!!
I always liked Debbie Gibson.
Seems like I would remember if I would date young women or not and could answer directly.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=kRtaceZ3aDo
Who cares. Nothing illegal happened.
This was almost 40 years ago he was a young man and unmarried and the consent law in AL made it legal.
Was there harassment or assault or stalking? Okay then. I don’t care. If this was happening years later and involved lecherous behavior and he was married then I’d have an issue.
Two people dating, and in one case the accuser said just kissing, is hardly a scandal. IF it was all legal and consensual.
So do you work for McConnell and McCain or are you simply an unpaid volunteer?
Good for you! You are improperly insinuating deceit where someone might be trying to be extra careful to avoid just that. Very poor form on your part. It’s wonderful that you have such a strong long term memory, not all of us have that. My memory is zilch so I can empathize with the judge.
SHOCKED /s
Sue the effin bitch- sick of this shit.
She could be Kathy Griffins sister.
Histrionics, RAPE...yeah....where’s a solid evidence? This is really bad psycjh 101. Not many if any will hold up to the stress of their lies.
Listen to it. It was a lousy interview. He did a terrible job.
This could end up costing her everything. Lying about someone like that is extremely illegal. In civil court the damages could really cost her.
Do the math:
-$139,000 - about $1,000,000 equals what?
I thought Hannity was doing Moore a favor with the interview.....I think Moore trusted Hannity and was trying to get the truth out there....
..BUT Hannity loaded his panel with Giraldo, Gregg Jarrett and some dame who literally tore Moore apart!!!...It was sick and sad what they did to him.
I guess Giraldo conveniently forgets about his ‘ towel dropped almost to the nether regions” selfie he took of himself and posted online.....practically naked....
....then gets on Hannity sounding so high and mighty
LAura Ingraham wasn’t any better.....saying she has a 12 year old and it makes her sick to her stomach IF Moore did that to a 14 yr old
WELL, I’M SICK OF THE LOT OF THEM
....except Moore
I hope he can shove this back in their faces!!!!!!
Laura was talking that way on her radio show earlier in the morning. Couldn’t believe it.
Levin has been great on this.
Did/does our side have an imbed in WaPo?
That's entirely true. If the parties control who they will allow to win primaries, we are really not much different than Communist countries that had bogus elections with only their chosen candidates on the ballot.
Imagine going into a restaurant and finding only two entrees on the menu, and you don't like either one. The management (e.g. ‘establishment) decided what those two entrees would be, and your only choice was which you disliked less. That's what our elections become when the establishment decides who they will accept coming out of the primaries.
The primaries are arguably the most important part of our essentially two-party voting system, as they allow a wide field of candidates, and are the most ‘grass roots’ aspect of our elections. Tampering with them subverts our right to choose our representation, and takes the reins of government away from the citizens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.