To: smileyface
He’s right. I don’t think Sessions has much choice though.
2 posted on
11/10/2017 6:50:44 PM PST by
Brilliant
To: Brilliant
He probably knows which relative will die first should anyone ever move against the Clintons.
9 posted on
11/10/2017 6:56:14 PM PST by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: Brilliant
“He’s right. I don’t think Sessions has much choice though.”
Why not?
36 posted on
11/10/2017 7:47:59 PM PST by
Ken H
(Best election ever!)
To: Brilliant
He’s right. I don’t think Sessions has much choice though. Perhaps that's true of crimes related to the election, but there's nothing stopping him from investigating Uranium One.
47 posted on
11/10/2017 8:35:23 PM PST by
Windflier
(Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
To: Brilliant
He’s right. I don’t think Sessions has much choice though.
______________________________________
Sessions needs to resign like any honorable man would do if he can't do his job. Then Trump would be free to appoint someone like Andrew McCarthy or Joe Dejenova who are not conflicted out of the job. It is a no brainer and the only conclusion to make of it is that Sessions, in collusion with the ‘Deep State,’ is holding the President hostage because Sessions knows that Trump knows the incredible flake he would get for straight way firing Sessions.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson