[Andy from Chapel Hill]

I rest my case. You just admitted I was right.

[little jeremiah]

placemark.

[RummyChick]

HOGWASH

This is my post that started your insanity:

To: rolling_stone
It does not say Sealed Indictments Case Study.

It is a Sealed CASES study.

A CASE IS NOT THE SAME AS AN INDICTMENT.

Not sure why people are still not understanding that a sealed docket entry is not necessarily indicative of an indictment.

A poster here talked about how they do it in his jurisdiction which does not make an entry for indictments until the case is unsealed.

He didn’t know how they do it in DC and neither do I.

---

So let’s be clear.

Your number is wrong. Your extrapolation is wrong. There weren’t just 284 sealed indictments filed in 2006. Read the doc.

So once again, this study PROVES my point. NOT ALL SEALED CASES ARE INDICTMENTS

So people should stop making that claim.