I have no idea what you are saying. It makes no sense.
The SEALED INDICTMENTS in CRIMINAL CASES are clearly highlighted.
What the hell is your point?
Everyone else on this board seems to have reasonable reading comprehension skills.
My point is that the recent activity in SEALED INDICTMENTS in CRIMINAL CASES in a few venues has exceeded the entire count of same in the 2006 PACER study.
Over and out.
You actually don’t know what you are reading.
I took a brief glance at the study because your argument made no sense.
That number you keep quoting??? It’s not what you think. It seems to me you are saying there were only 284 sealed indictments in the whole of USA in 2006..and then trying to extrapolate to say ..oh my..it must be Mueller in DC because it is such a large number in DC.
Preposterous on the face. Is that what you are claiming??? Only 284 sealed indictments in all of USA in 2006?
If so , go back and read that doc again.