Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Waymo now testing its self-driving cars on public roads with no one at the wheel
TechCrunch ^ | 11/7/2017 | Darrell Etherington

Posted on 11/07/2017 10:37:51 PM PST by iowamark

Waymo recently hosted a number of journalists at its private Castle testing compound, and treated us to rides with no safety driver behind the wheel – now, the former Google self-driving car company is going farther still, however, launching public road tests of its autonomous Chrysler Pacifica minivans with no safety driver on board.

The tests aren’t limited to one or two routes, either; the test area where the truly driverless trials are being conducted is in Chandler, Arizona (part of the greater Phoenix metro area), and the cars are able to go anywhere within this defined space. It’s hard to understate the importance of this milestone: Waymo is operating at full Level 4 autonomy, sharing public roads with human-driven cars and pedestrians, with no one at the wheel able to take over in case things don’t go as planned.

That shows confidence – confidence that Waymo has managed to achieve truly capable L4 autonomy within the specific domain of Chandler. The current passengers for this test are Waymo employees, however, so it’s not as if the Alphabet-owned company is throwing caution to the wind; instead, it’s showing that it’s ready to move to the next major phase of operations after around a decade of working on this incredibly complex problem.

Waymo CEO John Krafcik announced the fully driverless trials at Web Summit today, and revealed the video above, and also noted that while the trial is starting with employees first, it’s soon going to expand to the existing members of the Chandler driverless ride hailing service trial that Waymo kicked off at the beginning of 2017. When that happens (sometime in the next “few months,” per Krafcik, Waymo will be operating a fully autonomous ride hailing service without any humans at the wheel, a major first for the industry in terms of realizing the dream of making commercial self-driving available to the public at large.

Krafcik also said that Waymo wants to broaden the geographic scope of its trial, starting with expansion in the near-term to cover the entire Phoenix metro area, which represents more acreage than the whole of the Greater London area, he noted (though it’s obviously far less dense).

Residents participating in the trial will also be able to use them exactly as they use the test vehicles with safety chauffeurs today – for any trips within the designated area, whether for commutes, trips to go shopping, heading to school or whatever their transportation needs. They hail the vehicles using a Waymo app, and being the trip onboard with a push of a button. There’s also an onboard support system that allows them to talk to a live Waymo support agent at any time.

Waymo’s stated goal is to ensure safer roads for everyone, and after having spent some time in the fully driverless Pacifica that will be operating in Chandler, I’m more convinced than ever they’re on a path to make this happen. Bringing that truly driverless Level 4 experience to public roads and public riders is a huge step, and a sign we could be hailing an autonomous ride sooner than you might think.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: selfdriving; selfdrivingcar; waymo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: iowamark

What do semi truck drivers call Robot gadgets currently installed on trucks? Nice? Great? Thanks? NO!

Robot gadgets are called DANGEROUS GADGETS by drivers.

Live in your utopia dream land. But in the real world Robot Gadgets are dangerous, and turn Good drivers into Bad drivers.

But your ignorance must feel blissful.


21 posted on 11/08/2017 4:00:49 AM PST by TheNext (FBI FAKE STORY: Lone Shooter, But Died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark
Wammo might be a better name
22 posted on 11/08/2017 4:23:04 AM PST by Chode (You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

In the words of John Fogerty, “I see trouble on the way.”


23 posted on 11/08/2017 4:28:11 AM PST by From The Deer Stand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

“Waymo’s stated goal is to ensure safer roads for everyone”

Humans, you no longer need to be accomplished or skilled at anything, we robots will take care of you better than you can possibly take care of yourselves.


24 posted on 11/08/2017 4:31:55 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

>>>like 40,000 die annually. Maybe fewer with self-dr8ving cars.

I try to remind myself every time I get behind the wheel that half the cars I pass have below average drivers. (though they all think it’s the other guy).


25 posted on 11/08/2017 5:45:38 AM PST by oincobx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheNext

My neighbor recently got killed in his semi.

This neighbor had been driving a brand new computer controlled rig for months and then they had to put him in an older rig. I think he got so used to the self braking/collision avoidance feature that he got too relaxed to suddenly go without it.

Rammed into stopped traffic on the interstate. Luckily he hit other semis. Pushed the flatbed of one right through the cab but that guy lived. If it had been cars in front of him, he’d have killed anyone in the first 2-3 cars, maybe more.

Granted he was the easily distracted type and one of the younger crowd that’s constantly tapping on the phone with his two thumbs so that probably played into it as well. Got so used to being able to do that while hauling down the interstate at 70mph. (even though that’s not the way it’s supposed to work)


26 posted on 11/08/2017 6:22:51 AM PST by Pollard (TRUMP 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

The video is ideal weather and ideal traffic. What we in the software industry call the “happy path”. What about rain? At night? In snow while it’s snowing at night? I’m guessing it will likely shut these things down. Downtown Boston during rush hour? Again likely way to difficult still. Five-way intersections with lots of pedestrians? Color me skeptical.


27 posted on 11/08/2017 6:40:13 AM PST by DeltaZulu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

This technology will not survive First Contact
with the American tort bar.


28 posted on 11/08/2017 7:08:59 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: oincobx
like 40,000 die annually. Maybe fewer with self-dr8ving cars.

85% of the hazardous situations I see on the roads are caused by female drivers with cell phones. Sorry, gals, I calls it like I sees it.

Except for one woman who nearly t-boned me because her face was buried in an Egg McMuffin.


29 posted on 11/08/2017 7:11:23 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Except for one woman who nearly t-boned me because her face was buried in an Egg McMuffin.

I got t-boned by a red-light runner in a major downtown SF intersection. I had just dropped off my co-worker at our building a few blocks away. If he were in the car, he would have been killed as my car was totaled on the passenger side.

Despite getting knocked around, I got out and checked on the female driver who was slumped over the steering wheel. She was embarrassed more than injured, apologizing to me for hitting my car.

She was driving down the street, pretty fast, looking at storefronts for Nordstrom's store and blew through the red light. I forced the police to come out and get a statement showing she was at fault. Good thing, because I had to sue her insurance company for refusing to pay for damages. My lawyer got me a great settlement. If a driverless car hits me, who do I sue for damages?

30 posted on 11/08/2017 11:08:02 AM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: EVO X

“...Seems to me, level 4 wouldn’t be good enough. They still would need to pass their drivers exam and be able to control the car at a moments notice....”

I think that’s precisely the problem - They DO pass their driving exams already.

I was at DMV a few months ago and observed a cohort of extraordinarily elderly people who all were taking (and passing) their driving exams. All had trouble walking and most couldn’t really even read the forms they were filling out ( copious help from nurses or adult children ) .

I want to be clear that the Elderly absolutely need mobility and deserve independence. I welcome the coming of level 4 vehicles because My 83 year old Mother will be liberated from the stress of crashing and getting lost. She‘ll be able to visit friends much more often. Level 4 would be a godsendf for her and millions like her.


31 posted on 11/09/2017 2:03:43 AM PST by vooch (America First Drain the Swamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LambSlave

There are currently ~40,000 traffic fatalities per year. If that could be reduced to ~15,000 does it really matter that much to you that the most humane decision is made in each collision? In other words, what is your metric?

...

It’s all based on emotion. Driverless cars will be held to a standard of perfection. Carnage on the roads is OK as long as it’s traditional.


32 posted on 11/09/2017 2:42:00 AM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

What scares me is they are using Chrysler vehicles.


33 posted on 11/09/2017 2:42:28 AM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roadcat

If a driverless car hits me, who do I sue for damages?

...

The owner of the car, same as you do now.


34 posted on 11/09/2017 2:58:23 AM PST by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Nice video with pleasant generic music.

Perfect weather? Check.
Perfect roads? Check.
Light traffic? Check.
Few pedestrians? Check.
Perfect GPS guidance? Check.
Waymo car always available and on-time? Check.
No road repair or construction zones with flaggers? Check.
No police officers directing traffic with hand gestures? Check.
No unpredictable animals or debris in the street? Check.
No demonstrators, rioters, squeegee people, or holdup gangs in the street? Check.

What could possibly go wrong?


35 posted on 11/09/2017 3:56:29 AM PST by Fresh Wind (Hillary: Go to jail. Go directly to jail. Do not pass GO. Do not collect 2 billion dollars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vooch
I've seen autonomous cars referred as both level 4 and level 5. Maybe this becomes a reality sometime soon, but I doubt it. Lets say you have a car that can drive itself 90% to 95% of the time. The driver still has to be capable of driving the car and analyzing what is going on. This might not be good for elderly that have slower reaction times. If they are fully attentive, it could be a useful feature. But at what cost?

The cost of a new car will buy a lot of taxi, ride sharing, and shuttle trips.

36 posted on 11/09/2017 4:22:16 AM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: EVO X

level 4 is fully autonomous within a given geography.

level 5 needs no maps.


37 posted on 11/09/2017 4:26:25 AM PST by vooch (America First Drain the Swamp)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: vooch

Thanks for the clarification..


38 posted on 11/09/2017 4:49:11 AM PST by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: vooch
As I age, my 2000-mile bi-annual commute in retirement is becoming a drag. I'm actually looking forward to a "self-driving" car.

Where do I sign up?

39 posted on 06/21/2018 3:31:39 AM PDT by Does so (Let us make the word Mohammedism -- adding it to other ISMs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson