Posted on 11/04/2017 6:26:12 AM PDT by rktman
The newly-released National Climate Assessment (NCA) has sparked a tidal wave of media coverage, with a particular focus on how it contradicts the Trump administration’s stance on global warming.
Read pretty much any publication, and you’d also read that Americans are “already” feeling the effects of unchecked global warming. The NCA reviews and summarizes the state of global warming and how it may be impacting the U.S., attributing all current warming to human activities.
The NCA is the work of scientists, but the report’s media messengers are embellishing some of the report’s key findings with respect to current U.S. weather trends.
The New York Times, for example, reported “that every part of the country has been touched by warming, from droughts in the Southeast to flooding in the Midwest to a worrying rise in air and ground temperatures in Alaska, and conditions will continue to worsen.”
But that is not correct, according to University of Colorado professor Roger Pielke, Jr., an expert on extreme weather trends and natural disaster costs.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailycaller.com ...
NON print versioon:
If there should be a single purpose of this junk piece of pseudo-science, it is to gather the names of the academic leechers to be permanently banned from any taxpayers funding for at least ten generations.
Science in the hands of journalists is akin to music in the hands of Hip Hop “artists”.
Delingpole: Now 400 Scientific Papers in 2017 Say ‘Global Warming’ Is a Myth
breitbart.com ^ | 10/24/2017 | James Delingpole
Posted on 10/24/2017, 7:09:40 AM by rktman
When I reported earlier this year on the 58 scientific papers published in 2017 that say global warming is a myth the greenies’ heads exploded.
Since then, that figure has risen to 400 scientific papers.
Can you imagine the misery and consternation and horror this is going to cause in the corrupt, rancid, rent-seeking world of the Climate Industrial Complex?
I can. It will look something like this.
Just to be clear, so the greenies can’t bleat about being misrepresented, here is what these various papers say:
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I’ll see your post and raise you this:
1. Define the “correct” temperature range for the planet.
2. Define the “correct” humidity range for the planet.
3. Define the “correct” mean sea level for the planet.
4. Define the “correct” amount of precipitation for the planet.
5. Define the “correct” makeup of the atmosphere.
6. Define the “correct” amount of sea ice at the N/S poles.
7. Define/explain past glaciation and subsequent warming without any input from humans.
I did a quick search for a downloadable PDF of this phony report and came up dry.
Anyone who has a good link to the actual report should post it.
I think you have it. Much thanks.
From the document:
Key Finding 1
The likely range of the human contribution to the global mean temperature increase over the period 1951–2010 is 1.1° to 1.4°F (0.6° to 0.8°C), and the central estimate of the observed warming of 1.2°F (0.65°C) lies within this range (high confidence). This translates to a likely human contribution of 93%–123% of the observed 1951–2010 change. It is extremely likely that more than half of the global mean temperature increase since 1951 was caused by human influence on climate (high confidence). The likely contributions of natural forcing and internal variability to global temperature change over that period are minor (high confidence).
Um, okee dokee. LOL!
Great responses!
Also, how many of the temp gauges were moved to show higher temps.
The official gauge in Santa Rosa was at the airport under some redwood trees with shade. They moved the official temp gauge to the roof of the Press Democrat building, in down town Santa Rosa. Of course the new temps showed a heck off an increase.
Another city in N. California, moved its official temp gauge from its airport and put the temp gauge on top of a bakery’s roof near a busy 4 way intersection with 3 lanes in each route/street. So, being close to a bakery plus the exhaust from of 12 lanes of traffic kicked the smog measurements up higher as well as the temps..
How much of this bs was done throughout America and the world?
In my little world, I had an outside temp gauge in a protected area with a lot of shade on the east side of our home. I got a new temp/weather drone and put it on the SW side of our home on a fence post with no shade. For a year, my drone showed huge daily temp increases versus the year before.
Great responses!
Also, how many of the temp gauges were moved to show higher temps.
The official gauge in Santa Rosa was at the airport under some redwood trees with shade. They moved the official temp gauge to the roof of the Press Democrat building, in down town Santa Rosa. Of course the new temps showed a heck off an increase.
Another city in N. California, moved its official temp gauge from its airport and put the temp gauge on top of a bakery’s roof near a busy 4 way intersection with 3 lanes in each route/street. So, being close to a bakery plus the exhaust from of 12 lanes of traffic kicked the smog measurements up higher as well as the temps..
How much of this bs was done throughout America and the world?
In my little world, I had an outside temp gauge in a protected area with a lot of shade on the east side of our home. I got a new temp/weather drone and put it on the SW side of our home on a fence post with no shade. For a year, my drone showed huge daily temp increases versus the year before.
These chuckleheads get federal grant dollars to produce a specific result. That result simply says "we need more money to CONFIRM our INITIAL findings" and results in the next round of funding (waste of taxpayer dollars) and then the next, and the next, and the next .....
“This translates to a likely human contribution of 93%–123% of the observed 1951–2010 change.”
From 1951 to 1976: Cooling.
From 1977 to 1998: Warming
From 1998 to 2010: No Warming.
How these idiot scientists can conclude anything from that data is absurd.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.