Skip to comments.
Wasserman Schultz: ‘If I Was Trying to Rig the Outcome of the Primary — Trust Me, I Could Have’
Breitbart ^
| November 18, 2016
| Jeff Poor
Posted on 11/03/2017 12:33:42 PM PDT by Servant
In an interview with Vice’s Shawna Thomas, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL), the former chairwoman of the Democratic National Committee, hit back at critics suggesting she tilted her party’s primary process in favor of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton over Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT).
“I will be frank with you,” she said. “If I was trying to rig the outcome of the primary, trust me, I could have — there are so many things that we, not I, we could have done to enhance the campaign of one candidate over another.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016demprimary; berniesanders; brazilebook; clinton; crooked; debbie; democrat; democratic; democrats; dnc; dncstrategy; dws; dwsinterview; electionrigging; hillary; hillary2016; hillaryclinton; medusa; oldinterview; primary; rigged; sanders; wassermanschultz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Video at link.
1
posted on
11/03/2017 12:33:42 PM PDT
by
Servant
To: Servant
2
posted on
11/03/2017 12:35:30 PM PDT
by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: Servant
You were and you did!
All I can say is that I earnestly hope and pray that she goes to prison along with Hildabeast.
3
posted on
11/03/2017 12:35:52 PM PDT
by
Jmouse007
(Lord God Almighty, deliver us from this evil in the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, amen.)
To: Servant
She needs to stop digging. She’s in deep enough already. But then I would never accuse her of being smart or ethical...
4
posted on
11/03/2017 12:37:03 PM PDT
by
Migraine
((A smartass who is right can be downright funny. A smartass who is wrong is just a smartass.))
To: Servant
5
posted on
11/03/2017 12:37:09 PM PDT
by
SERKIT
("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
To: Paladin2; JPG; JoeProBono
Keep lying, Debbie.
Maybe the lies will work this time.
I knew they were in big trouble when Debbie Wasserman Mayo Schultz put her hands over her mouth in shock when her lies backfired. Maybe somebody can find the video. Or a .jpg. I’ll ping a couple folks.
6
posted on
11/03/2017 12:37:57 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: Servant
I called her the boogerwomen long before...
oh, "boogey"...
Never mind.
7
posted on
11/03/2017 12:38:06 PM PDT
by
RckyRaCoCo
(FUMSM)
To: SERKIT
[Cray-Cray...]
Mayo-Mayo.
8
posted on
11/03/2017 12:38:25 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: Servant
So when it is shown that *someone* did ... she becomes prime suspect. Perfect.
9
posted on
11/03/2017 12:39:44 PM PDT
by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: Servant
[ “I will be frank with you,” ]
She’s transgendering to Frank Wasserman Schultz now?
(it was there so....)
10
posted on
11/03/2017 12:39:49 PM PDT
by
SaveFerris
(Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
To: Servant
She could have done plenty. That’s the whole point! She was in a position to totally screw over one of the candidates because of Hillary’s crooked scheme. Whatever she did was too much and she needs to be exposed.
11
posted on
11/03/2017 12:39:51 PM PDT
by
Genoa
(Luke 12:2)
To: Servant
12
posted on
11/03/2017 12:40:48 PM PDT
by
Louis Foxwell
(Progressivism is 2 year olds in a poop fight.)
To: Paladin2
She just admitted that she had the means to rig the outcome. And it is easy to show she had the motive and opportunity to commit the crime.
To: Servant
"“I will be frank with you,” she said. “If I was trying to rig the outcome of the primary, trust me, I could have — there are so many things that we, not I, we could have done to enhance the campaign of one candidate over another.”
14
posted on
11/03/2017 12:42:15 PM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(What, we have here, is a failure to communicate!)
To: Servant
She could have and she did. The proof was in her emails... Is she saying that Hillary would have beat Bernie if she wanted it to happen? Duh.
To: Servant
THAT’S between HER and HILLARY!! :)
16
posted on
11/03/2017 12:44:00 PM PDT
by
SMARTY
("Nearly all men can stand adversity...to test a man's character, give him power." A. Lincoln)
To: Servant
Is this what they mean by braggadocious?
17
posted on
11/03/2017 12:45:14 PM PDT
by
Leep
(Less talk more ACTiON!)
To: Servant
“I will be frank with you,” she said. “If I was trying to rig the outcome of the primary, trust me, I could have — there are so many things that we, not I, we could have done to enhance the campaign of one candidate over another.”Yeah Debbie...we know.
18
posted on
11/03/2017 12:48:33 PM PDT
by
pgkdan
(The Silent Majority Stands With TRUMP!)
To: Servant
That might be a smart thing to have said if Bernie won and she were accused of merely TRYING to fix the election.
19
posted on
11/03/2017 12:53:45 PM PDT
by
dangus
To: Servant
I see... It's not rigging if you don't do EVERYTHING possible.
"Your Honor, trust me... if I wanted to rob the bank I would have taken ALL of the money."
-PJ
20
posted on
11/03/2017 12:54:20 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson