Posted on 11/03/2017 7:44:56 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum
Rapidly growing human populations risk having a "terrible impact" on the world, the Duke of Cambridge has warned.
The Duke said that as a result, wildlife was being put under "enormous pressure" and called for the issue to be addressed with renewed vigour.
His concerns echo those of his grandfather, the Duke of Edinburgh, who in 2011 advocated “voluntary family limitation" as a means of solving overpopulation, which he described as the biggest challenge in conservation.
His grandson, royal patron of the Tusk Trust, told the charity’s gala dinner in London that measures needed to be taken to save certain animal populations.
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
The Liberal Mecca of San Francisco has an average population density of 18,537 persons / sq mi. (Manila is 107,000... Paris is 55,000... Cairo is 46,000... )
If the population of the entire planet (7.6 billion) were put into one place with the same population density as SF, we would all fit into an area the size of 410,000 sq mi... about the size of Iraq...
Seems like there's a bit of room left.
Even better, Prince Harry seems to love hobnobbing with the Obamas every chance he gets.
Is that what other people are here for, for us to use? And then, conversely, are "we" here for others to use? Are you any use to the people you have no use for?
What ARE people "for"?
And how could their interest in life be any less than ours, if together we make a "we"?
Please reassure me that you're not a robot or something.
Because at some point, the robots could realize "they" could use a lot less people, and boy, could they get selective.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.