There was another table at the link which shows taxes paid vs benefits received.
That’s the important one, and one you may have missed.
I did not miss it. But how can I put any confidence in how they conclude that when they clearly are misleading in the SNAP cost chart.
In the SNAP chart, they imply the Mississippi is spending 4 times as much as CA on SNAP when, if you go by actual people on SNAP, CA is spending 4 times as much as Mississippi (2 million on SNAP vs 500k).
If this link is your only evidence, its not really evidence.