Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/28/2017 6:02:42 PM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: CodeToad

A Calif law I can AGREE with..?

Weird.


2 posted on 10/28/2017 6:05:46 PM PDT by gaijin (Basically Obama lawyers would blatantly make up some totally groundless allegation against a fat cas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

I like that.


3 posted on 10/28/2017 6:06:57 PM PDT by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

What’s next?

Can’t ask the ingredients on a menu item?

Can’t ask the size of the shoes you are contemplating purchasing online?

Can’t ask the marital history of a potential date?


4 posted on 10/28/2017 6:08:36 PM PDT by XEHRpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

“Hoe valuable were you at this job to your previous employer?”
“I want a lawyer! I’m gonna sue!”


5 posted on 10/28/2017 6:08:50 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

Coming soon: “You will hire who we tell you to hire.”


8 posted on 10/28/2017 6:10:37 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (<img src="http://i.imgur.com/WukZwJP.gif" width=800>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

Wow - never saw this one coming. Some DoD contractors are about to get rocked ...


9 posted on 10/28/2017 6:11:18 PM PDT by 11th_VA (Kudos to President Trump for denouncing ALL violence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Women in the People’s Republic of China enjoy equal rights with men in all spheres of life, in political, economic, cultural, social and family life.

The state protects the rights and interests of women, applies the principle of equal pay for equal work to men and women alike and trains and selects cadres from among women.

— Article 48 of PRC constitution
Just for those who wonder where that “equal pay” mantra comes from.
12 posted on 10/28/2017 6:13:00 PM PDT by Olog-hai ("No Republican, no matter how liberal, is going to woo a Democratic vote." -- Ronald Reagan, 1960)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

The good news is, in CA if you intentionally give your Employer or Employee AIDS, you get a Misdemeanor Ticket instead of being charged with a Felony.

Utopia, it’s only way to fly.


16 posted on 10/28/2017 6:16:55 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative ( Democracy, two Wolves and one Sheep deciding what's for Dinner.Does the Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

I had a recent hire provide his current salary information in a request to be hired at an equivalent salary. I wouldn’t be able to judge the merit of such a request without that information.


22 posted on 10/28/2017 6:25:11 PM PDT by exDemMom (Current visual of the hole the US continues to dig itself into: http://www.usdebtclock.org/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

I had an applicant present a resume that included copies of his first and last paystub for each of his previous jobs. Not only did it show his upward progression at every stage, but the resume’s presentation showed he was organized, and documented things properly.

I knew I had a winner, and I was right.


23 posted on 10/28/2017 6:37:43 PM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad
Many (most?) companies require you to sign a non-disclosure agreement. An employer shouldn't ask you to violate a previous non-disclosure agreement as a condition of employment.

Not sure if there should be law about it, but when you can't get a job without violating ethics because every hiring manager and HR stooge demands salary info, that can be problematic to say the least.

25 posted on 10/28/2017 6:39:00 PM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Flag burners can go screw -- I'm mighty PROUD of that ragged old flag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

Good. If you find a candidate you want to hire, pay them what you think the job is worth. Stop trying to lowball candidates based on what their last job paid - it’s none of your business.


29 posted on 10/28/2017 7:09:32 PM PDT by AnotherUnixGeek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

They won’t stop until the inequality is equal in its inequal equality...in Kalifornica, this is perfectly logical.

Everything must be engineered to fairness according to acid head burnouts.


33 posted on 10/28/2017 7:32:06 PM PDT by CincyRichieRich (The Left's family value: 'The U.S. is the great enemy of mankind!' (Che Guevara, 1961))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

Yeah I’m sayin Mickey D’s paid me $20 an hour!


59 posted on 10/29/2017 11:34:26 AM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

Can’t go along with this. Luckily, I’m not in California and don’t have to.

Yes, when making hiring decisions, my dad/boss/co-owner and I, in an ideal world, would know exactly what a position is worth, be able to easily identify a person that fits pretty close, and efficiently deal with hiring the right person at the right salary.

We live in a far from ideal world, though. Especially in our small, complicated engineering company, every single person is different and most don’t ever fit. A chemical engineer coming a big firm like Bechtel will both be too expensive and likely too pigeonholed in their focus to do what we do. Knowing what they were previously getting paid lets us know whether we should even spend any time on them trying to come up with a more realistic offer given their apparent skillset or if they were just banking it at their old place during good times and our offer is not going to sit well with them. Even if they do seem open to a reduced offer, you can pretty much tell how quickly they’ll jump ship as soon the market picks up and the big boys have tons of money to wastefully throw around again. It’s a game, and you need to know what the playing field looks like.

But, to just strip things down to brass tacks, obviously, the premise of this law—leveling the playing field between men and women—is based on a complete myth. No one I’ve seen has more perfectly tackled this than Maddox in this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BDj_bN0L8XM Five minute mandatory watching to know how to argue against this crap.

Also, this is just another regulation and hassle companies do not need. HR is already a terrifying minefield. And I live in Texas which you’d think wouldn’t be that bad. Nominally, we’re allowed to terminate for almost any reason at any time. Practically, however, it’s the worst scenario of walking on eggshells, where you have to pick every word you say perfectly to avoid the potential specter of a lawsuit. It’s so draining, and this would just be another thing to play chess about when you just want to get things done. It’s awful. Stay the hell out of my business ESPECIALLY when you’re using fiction to justify your further incursion.


67 posted on 10/29/2017 11:53:43 AM PDT by According2RecentPollsAirIsGood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: CodeToad

Great law. Even loony libs have good idea every now and then.


68 posted on 10/29/2017 11:54:32 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson