Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tet68

Maybe there’s an angle I’m not catching, but it seems to me that the cost of the war would have made it harder to pay for the “Great Society” programs, not easier.

It all came out of the federal budget. Without the cost of the war, wouldn’t there have been much more funds for those programs?

It would be interesting to know how much of our $20 trillion in debt is directly related to the “Great Society” / “War on Poverty” programs also.


61 posted on 10/28/2017 5:31:14 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Rush Limbaugh: 45% of California families speak a foreign language at home. Oth src: full U.S. 21%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

To people like LBJ the war and attendant protests
were worth it just to keep the taxpayer from realizing
how much the “great” society was going to cost.

But hey, we can trust politicians right?

Politicians are actors.
In ancient Greece actors had a name...hypocrites.


71 posted on 10/28/2017 6:27:15 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson