Posted on 10/26/2017 4:00:52 PM PDT by markomalley
Note: Normal people might find some of this offensive. (We hope. Dear Lord, please!)
Are you a good witch or a bad witch?
Answer yes either way and that might make you an alt-leftie. Marketwatch just ran an interesting piece headlined, “Why millennials are ditching religion for witchcraft and astrology.” It didn’t really tell me anything I didn’t know. Young people are embracing the occult faster than you can spell it.
This shouldn’t be surprising. They’ve been getting bombarded with witches, spells, demons, vampires and more for decades -- from Harry Potter to Twilight. It only makes sense that they want to join in. Or, in the words of Buffy the Vampire Slayer witch Willow, they are all “wanna-blessed-bes.” That term even has its own Urban Dictionary mention. Modern feminism especially embraces the occult and witchcraft over the “patriarchy” of traditional faiths.
The Marketwatch story includes all sorts of depressing information, including how, “more than half of young adults in the U.S. believe astrology is a science. compared to less than 8% of the Chinese public.” Reporter Kari Paul also noted, “The psychic services industry — which includes astrology, aura reading, mediumship, tarot-card reading and palmistry, among other metaphysical services … is now worth $2 billion annually, according to industry analysis firm IBIS World.” Cue P.T. Barnum.
The alt-left are some of the major beneficiaries of this insanity. Top liberal sites like Vice, Buzzfeed, Bustle and even Cosmo push the occult on their young readers. Countless internet sites run horoscopes, as newspapers did before them. But some outlets go a lot farther. Cosmo interviews “certified astrologer John Marchesella,” who claims that Aries folks, “don't hold grudges. When you think about it, it takes a lot of patience to hold on to resentments." This is how you know it’s garbage. I’m an Aries. (Other famous Aries are Lady Gaga and Kourtney Kardashian. So I got that goin’ for me.)
Over at BuzzFeed, which pretends to be a news organization but is a listicle sweat shop, they do a ton of clickbaity astrology stories. There’s, “66 Taurus Celebrities That Prove They're The Astrologically Superior Sign.” The list includes The Rock, Adele and George Clooney and I got Gaga and a lesser Kardashian, ugh. BuzzFeed did have a cute quiz: “What Your Star Sign Actually Says About You, According To Science.” Click any of the 12 results and it takes you to an answer stating: “You got: Sorry, the stars do not have any bearing on your daily life.” Why then do sites run this garbage? Because it’s web traffic. Not news or integrity.
There’s a cauldron full of witchcraft on these sites. Bustle tells us, “What Witches Can Teach Us About Fighting Back Against Trump.” Or, “How I Found Out My Grandma Was A Witch.” There’s a sitcom feel to some of these stories.
Broadly advertises its occult ties in promo copy. Here are two ads that run next to each other on the site. “Never miss a Mercury retrograde again. GET YOUR HOROSCOPE IN YOUR INBOX, EVERY DAY.” And, my favorite, “Sex, drugs, culture, politics, witchcraft.” I think the Ian Drury version of ‘sex and drugs and rock ’n’ roll” was better and less soul-destroying.
All of that double, double, toil and trouble takes us to this week’s bewitching column, beginning with the resistance:
(video at link)
Red Witches Fighting Capitalism: My brother used to say that you could nail two things together that had never been nailed together before and someone would buy it. Broadly, witch is part of Vice, brewed up this story: “How the Socialist Feminists of WITCH Use Magic to Fight Capitalism.”
Apparently, witchy women have been fighting the power for decades. “The first incarnation of WITCH performed their inaugural action on Halloween in 1968 in New York. Dressed in witch costumes, the activists flocked to the Financial District and chanted "Wall Street, Wall Street, up against the Wall Street" to hex the engine of capitalism,” according to Broadly.
It sure worked. The Dow was around 6,500 in Fall 1968, and it’s now about 23,000. That’s three-and-a-half times what it was. So maybe they didn’t learn to spell correctly. Eventually, the group broke up and went every witch way. Now they’ve gotten the coven back together. “But now a new generation of witches is taking up the mantle from the infamous protestors and carrying on their blend of activism, occult, and theater.”
Actually, bewitching quote: “The requirements to join WITCH are simple: You must stand for anti-racism, anti-fascism, anti-patriarchy, indigenous rights, gender self-determination, women's liberation, trans liberation, anti-rape culture, reproductive rights, sex worker support, LGBTQIA rights, environmental protection, religious freedom, immigrant rights, anti-war, anti-capitalism, disability justice, privacy rights, and workers rights. You must also have ample free time to devote to hexing, ritual ceremonies, calling your representatives, and attending marches.” The alt-left is 100 percent aligned with the coven next door.
Yes, the whole article reads like this. I recommend reading it, even if they do turn you into a frog for laughing at them.
I Put A Spell On You: Witchcraft seems inextricably tied to love as desperate people will do almost anything to win the hearts of those they desire -- even relying on dark arts. But for Cosmo to promote this nuttiness seems unusually crafty for the pro-sex publication.
The story is hilariously headlined: “I Gave a Witch $500 to Stop My Boyfriend From Cheating.” When author Jules McClean (“Names have been changed,” and who can blame her?) discovered her boyfriend Jeff was a cheating scumbag, she decided to … rely on witchcraft to change him.
Not to defend Jeff, because cheating is awful, but it could be he also realized his girlfriend was certifiable. Her sisters told her, “to visit a witch” to see into her future. Apparently, counseling was out of the question. She started consulting dial-a-witch. Soon she paid the witch $80 for a bottle of perfume. Here’s a spellbinding actual quote: “The perfume didn't have a smell to it, and it was pee-colored, with a variety of tiny plastic penises floating in it.” I guess the penises are why Cosmo liked this story.
Then her crystal ball crashes to the floor. “After a few of months of penis perfume spraying, sitting in magic baths, and sending Carmela a total of about $500,” she discovered it was a scam and the witch was quizzing her own sister for info, not predicting the future.
You would think Cosmo would learn its lesson from that story, but they were out promoting singer Lana Del Rey and the witchcraft against Trump earlier this year. Actual headline: “Good Witch Lana Del Rey Participated in Casting a Spell Against Trump.”
‘Witchcraft: 10 Common Myths Debunked’: Leave it to the loons at Teen Vogue to give what amounts to a how-to guide to witchcraft. It even turns to “practicing witch,” Sarah Lyons to set us all straight on practical magic. Here’s thesis statement: “But popular as witchcraft is, it’s hard to know where to start.” (The story even includes a handy link to, “What It Means to Be a Witch.”)
According to Lyons, witchcraft “can be an empowering one for many women.” She added, “there are plenty of different magical paths and traditions out there.” Yes, they believe this. Maybe we are doomed. She adds, “It’s good to support local occult businesses, artists, and authors, but you don’t need to go out and buy a bunch of incense, wands, or crystals to get started.” So the fair trade and localism movements have even taken over the occult.
Next she gives the killer actual quote: “Print out a picture of the god you want to work with from the internet, find what herbs you need in the pantry, or better yet outside.” Yes, pro-science, anti-Christian libs think you can find a random deity on the Internet simply by googling or maybe looking up options in the Advanced Dungeons & Dragons Deities & Demigods book.
Another actual quote that should get you running to your local occult store: “You won’t get pregnant or catch an STI every time you have sex, and you won't get possessed every time you use a Ouija board, but you should always be careful.” Good to know that you won’t get possessed “every time” you use a Ouija board. So what are the chances? 90 percent? 10?
Just remember, the future, your future is in the hands of people who believe in this garbage.
And so if one reads a book one does not have to do what it says or believe what is written
And who are you to judge them?
But if the Bible is true, then turning to witchcraft is turning away from God.
Similar statements could be said of virtually any other religion.
That seems rather harsh. While some entertainment can undoubtedly be described that way, I would instead characterize the vast majority of it the same way the Earth is described in "The Hitchhihker's Guide to the Galaxy".
"Mostly harmless".
My brother's seventh grade teacher was into wicca back in the seventies.
If you want to trace it's roots you have to go to the major out break of spiritualism in the US following the civil war. It spread to the Europe and then came back to the US as wicca.
It sloshed around a bit until the sixties when it became rooted in counter culture.
As counter culture flourished in the universities so did wicca.
Did Harry Potter contribute? Maybe.
But then maybe so did Bewitched, The Magic School Bus, Sabrina the Teenage Witch, Dungeons and Dragons, books by Robert Heinlein and Poul Anderson, Edgar Cayce and Joyce Dixson.
It would be nice to have something to pin it on so we could say, "There! That is where the problem started."
But if you want to dig down to the root you have to look all the way back to Eden and the Serpent whispering "You will be like gods" and a man and woman saying "Sounds good to us!"
Harry Potter was very distinct in that it got to the younger generation, and it did so by encouraging active engagement in the silly behavior. The only thing on your list like that is D and D, and that has not been as popular.
So my point is that I take the anti-Harry Potter position.
What’s very interesting is the tide of activists defending Harry Potter books for the past decade or more. It was a big controversy on talk shows twelve or fifteen years ago.
I’ve heard otherwise very sensible people defending Harry Potter, likely after being taken in by whatever it is that stirs the emotions so strongly about these books. Never saw anything like this emotional defensiveness about the other things on your list.
No, not in this context pertaining to the particular points of our conversation.
I don’t judge them, but the question of judging them or not judging them is not what I’m trying to point out.
I’m showing you that it’s possible to go through the motions of a practice or ceremony that for some is a religious ritual and worship, but for others is mostly meaningless. Because worship is of the heart.
Movies and television are an extremely powerful influence on human behavior. Look at ad revenues.
Hollywood is a major causal influence on all the horrible things people do. So mostly harmful.
Of course they don’t have to. You’re right about that.
But many do practice the things Rowling has written about. I believe this is associated with turning away from God.
You are showing nothing
You can stop now because I will not respond
You think the Lord of the Rings which dealt heavily with magic was not at all influential?
You may take the anti-Harry Potter position all you like but the fact is that Harry Potter is as far away from wicca as you can get and still be dealing with magic.
The magic in the world of Harry Potter is a genetic. If you have the right genes you can use magic.
The magic in Waldo was energy from another dimension.
The magic in Lord of the Rings is learned and involves worship.
If you want to pin wicca on anyone you would have to go after JRR Tolkien.
Of course it was already flourishing before he was a gleam in his daddy's eye so that could be a problem.
I know you want to blame Hairy Trotter, the Colt who Lived but the evidence does not support your contention.
Kids were dressing up and playing at being wizards long before he cantered onto the stage.
I hope you continue to think about this.
You don’t have to stop responding.
There is a whole lot of history that you seem to be ignoring.
I don't know about "major", but I'll grant it's an influence. Still scratching my head at why anyone would think ill of Casper the Friendly Ghost cartoons, though.
Not thinking ill of Caspar the ghost. What I was trying to point out was that Hollywood depictions of the supernatural are very different from the true supernatural, and that the result of this is that the average person is clueless in their opinions about the supernatural because they’re looking for the wrong thing. They’re looking for a cartoon that doesn’t exist.
I think the disconnect here is that you’re asserting that certain stories over the many decades have witchcraft as content, period. Meanwhile what I’m pointing out is that Harry Potter books have had a particular behavioral effect on young readers.
So of course there have been stories about witchcraft for many centuries before Harry Potter. But none have caused so many young people to want to act it out as these books by Rowling.
In C.S. Lewis’s book, “The Screwtape Letters”, he said old Screwtape recommended to Wormwood, ‘When we get humans to a point where they believe in witchcraft and science we have the Materialist Magician. That is the goal.
Well, the supernatural as portrayed in a typical Hollywood film is understood by the audience to be fantasy. That's what makes it an entertaining diversion.
One doesn't go to see "Dr. Strange" expecting to see anything which actually exists. That's the whole point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.