Posted on 10/24/2017 8:11:06 AM PDT by rktman
Steven Crowder is one of the more interesting personalities on YouTube, mostly because he’s funny while also providing some pretty smart commentary. He recently tried something new. He set up a table at Texas University and challenged students to change his mind. In the process, he challenges their points of view.
Oh, let’s see, a trans woman who believes that there is a police brutality problem in this country, but then only wants the police to be walking around armed all the time. Of course, she also believes the police have a legal responsibility to protect people. (Narrator voice: They don’t.)
(Excerpt) Read more at bearingarms.com ...
Maybe he could convince them by beating them with a tire tool, and then asking them if they wished they had a gun now...
Or at least smack the back of their skulls against the sidewalk ala tres gone martin.
The first girl is a moron making it too painful to watch all the way through.
Sorry about that. Sometimes you gotta suffer to get to the other side. ;-)
P.S. Surely she isn’t the only one either.
Leftists are full of stupid and illogical contradictions like this. I argued with some recently - They all agreed that globalism is great, interaction of cultures is wonderful, free travel and immigration all good. I pointed out to them - well, then you must believe Christopher Columbus was great! He was the first globalist!
I do like to understand how the other side thinks but most of these right / left interviews I’ve seen have the most pathetic liberals making the case. I just can’t take much of it.
I’m told there are smart liberals out there but I’ve yet to see proof!!!
The ones making the big bucks off the useless fidiots are apparently the “smart” ones.
You can own a gun but have to have it locked in a safe at all times. She is so smart.
ROFLMAO Funny!
There is no point in having any discussion with someone who is unwilling to change their mind when confronted with the right evidence.
To even *HAVE* a discussion instead of a fight both parties implicitly are testing what they regard as the Truth against the best attacks of the other. Only cowards are afraid to do this (again besides people who feel they have some direct revelation). “Argument”, in classical rhetoric means ‘reason giving’.
I personally have as an Absolute only one thing: I reserve the right to change my mind about ANYTHING when presented with new evidence I think warrants it.
Lol! To “them”, there is no right data/info.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.