Posted on 10/23/2017 8:41:54 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Nearly a month has passed since Stephen Paddock opened fire on a country music festival at the Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino in Las Vegas, killing 58 people and wounding hundreds more yet the shooting continues to confound the public and investigators alike. Little is known about Mr. Paddocks motives. And investigators have revised parts of the timeline of the shooting on three occasions, raising further questions about what exactly happened.
During continuing investigations into major events, traditional reporting often relies in part on official statements from law enforcement officers. But in this case, faced with shifting reports, The New York Times wanted to try to establish a timeline independent of that offered by the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department.
Where is Jesus, the Security Guard?? Back in Mexico? Something is VERY FISHY about his story,
Then WHY dont you answer one of the above or below.
1. Why was a fuzzy photo with eyes shut circulated of the accused for the first 48 hrs?
Because that was the best current photo the media was able to get?
2. Why was the second photo circulated of the accused over 25 years old?
Because it was clearer, but it was old? Reports are the killer was a very private person. I have known people like that, that did not want/let pictures of them be taken.
3. Why is there no video of the accused shared from within the casino, lobby, parking lot, or hallway?
Because it is private property and the casino did not want to release it? The Casino is looking at hundreds of millions of dollars in lawsuits.
The NYT is not a creditable source for any info other than professional sports box scores.
Completely unacceptable answer if we are to assume that law enforcement sought assistance from the public in searching for possible accomplices or any background information on the shooter.
A Nevada Driver’s License Photo - Passport Photo
Completely unacceptable answer if we are to assume that law enforcement sought assistance from the public in searching for possible accomplices or any background information on the shooter.
Why would you assume that? I have not seen any evidence of it.
Why would government agencies release official photographs to the media?
Yea, was there 308(7.62) and 556 brass? I only saw 556 in the pictures I saw. Should be fairly easy to discern the difference in the wounds.
What happens in Vegas appears to stay in Vegas and that is the way that Vegas likes it.....
That would not surprise me one little bit.
And this one pulls out the signal from the noise to determine a second shooter. Promotes himself as an expert.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.