[zeestephen]

Re: “And there are a lot more of us.”

That’s delusional.

Trump lost the popular vote by 3 million.

Voter fraud? That’s also delusional.

The election was 12 months ago. How many cases of voter fraud have been prosecuted? 100? 500? Millions and millions of fraudulent votes were allegedly cast, but the 30+ states with GOP governors and legislatures can’t find anyone to prosecute!

The only way the GOP can win a national election is if large numbers of Blacks and LEGAL Hispanics stay home - which is what happened in 2016 - or if the GOP steadily increases its current 58% share of white voters.

[Herakles]

Cram it clown!

[b4me]

silly human math/thinking.

God has his own math system and His own ways of thinking.

some call them miracles and try to understand.

the rest don’t need an explanation, it’s just God being God.

“delusional” is thinking you can outsmart God, or leaving no room for Him in your calculations.

[9YearLurker]

The system is set up so voter fraud can’t generally be pinned on people. Are you really that clueless?

[Robert DeLong]

So in your opinion then all, murders have been successfully prosecuted. If prosecution is the standard bearer for reality, then that has to be true. Now thanks to DNA, cases previously unsolved are being resolved in small numbers, but many more remain unsolved due to lack of DNA evidence. Proving voter fraud does not have the luxury of definitive proof such as DNA.

The truth is that it has never been aggressively investigated to know how deep voter fraud goes. We are now beginning such an investigation, at least hopefully that is what that commission is doing.

[datricker]

The only way the GOP can win a national election is if large numbers of Blacks and LEGAL Hispanics stay home - which is what happened in 2016 - or if the GOP steadily increases its current 58% share of white voters.

Paging Michael Medved someone has stolen your discredited theory and is using it again.

Your wrong because identity politics is an over simplistic lens upon which to forecast elections you are applying Bayesian statistics to a phenomenon better described using the mathmatics of Causality . Your mistake is correlating the results and then going back to attribute causation. Which does seem on the surface to make sense but as we saw last election that theory was espoused (why we must have another Bush Yeb!) and was wrong in that case.

Simply put most people vote their pocket book not their skin color that is the causal rule (totally my opinion).

Govern like Trump and more people suddenly start voting white. Will their skin change color? Unless your last name is Zimmerman then the answer is no.

This is my theory so take it with a grain of salt.

Also the Trump Train is a fun place to be - smiling confident people and a non vegan club car. Confidence is attractive.

Welcome to the party