Posted on 10/21/2017 10:23:50 AM PDT by Olog-hai
A California judge on Friday threw out a $417 million verdict against Johnson & Johnson in a lawsuit by a woman who claimed she developed ovarian cancer after using its talc-based products like Johnsons Baby Powder for feminine hygiene.
The ruling by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Maren Nelson marked the latest setback facing women and family members who accuse J&J of not adequately warning consumers about the cancer risks of its talc-based products.
The decision followed a jurys decision in August to hit J&J with the largest verdict to date in the litigation, awarding California resident Eva Echeverria $70 million in compensatory damages and $347 million in punitive damages.
Nelson on Friday reversed the jury verdict and granted J&Js request for a new trial. Nelson said the August trial was underpinned by errors and insufficient evidence on both sides, culminating in excessive damages.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
Yep.
the amount was beyond stoopid.
By now, everyone should know that too much of anything causes cancer.
There is a slow but continuous flow of uterine fluids out the cervix into the vagina and out the vaginal orifice. I am mystified as to how talc could get into the uterus, up the Fallopian tubes and to the ovaries. There is also a flow of fluid down the Fallopian tubes. This is the bodies normal protection mechanism. It is a cleansing flow that protects against infection.
Sperm can and do. They swim, talcum powder does not swim. I think this is a bogus lawsuit.
Sperm motility is why oopsies happen, not vaginas' vacuuming effect, whatever that is.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.