She is really off her rocker..............
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: Sub-Driver
“We have to pass the law before you find out what’s in it.”
2 posted on
10/12/2017 1:12:14 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: All
The President is the Commander-in-Chief of American armed forces, you stupid twit...
3 posted on
10/12/2017 1:13:17 PM PDT by
JBW1949
(I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
To: Sub-Driver
But it’s perfectly OK to help North Korea and Iran get nuclear weapons.
4 posted on
10/12/2017 1:14:20 PM PDT by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Trump: Greatest POTUS of all time solely for preventing Satan taking office.)
To: Sub-Driver
Oh, Nancy-Pansie, you mean you want an unconstitutional law? Why, sure! Nothin’ new for you, huh wench?
5 posted on
10/12/2017 1:14:52 PM PDT by
Migraine
((A smartass who is right can be downright funny. A smartass who is wrong is just a smartass.))
To: Sub-Driver
She is really off her rocker..............That's why we need her around. She takes up space and is so off the wall that nobody takes her seriously anymore.
6 posted on
10/12/2017 1:15:18 PM PDT by
seawolf101
(Member LES DEPLORABLES)
To: Sub-Driver
Just one more example of how the left would gladly see the USA get destroyed and will do anything they can to facilitate it.
7 posted on
10/12/2017 1:15:39 PM PDT by
capydick
(“Within the covers of the Bible are the answers for all the problems men face.)
To: Sub-Driver
8 posted on
10/12/2017 1:16:19 PM PDT by
outofsalt
( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything)
To: Sub-Driver
It is much more important that there be a new law that requires members of congress to be mentally competent. But as we are shown daily by McCain, Pelosi and others, there are a number of mentally defective already serving.
9 posted on
10/12/2017 1:16:23 PM PDT by
falcon99
To: Sub-Driver
10 posted on
10/12/2017 1:17:19 PM PDT by
GrandJediMasterYoda
(Trump: Greatest POTUS of all time solely for preventing Satan taking office.)
To: Sub-Driver
That’s just Cryin Chuckie peeing in her ear.
To: Sub-Driver
Looks like the anti-senility drugs aren’t working
To: Sub-Driver
The height of arrogance. Ms. Pelosi believes only her people have the self control. We see it every day in the news don’t we.
14 posted on
10/12/2017 1:19:05 PM PDT by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists Call 'em what you will, they all have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: Sub-Driver
Obama had terrorists into the Oval Office to advise him, and Nancy wasn’t concerned at all.
15 posted on
10/12/2017 1:19:36 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(John McBane is the turd in the national punch-bowl.)
To: Sub-Driver
16 posted on
10/12/2017 1:19:40 PM PDT by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: Sub-Driver
I bet she is at the top of the list for Alzheimer Drugs delivered daily to the capitol.
17 posted on
10/12/2017 1:20:21 PM PDT by
eyeamok
(Idle hands are the Devil's workshop)
To: Sub-Driver
"she characterized the 1946 law authorizing the president to launch pre-emptive nuclear strikes as ancient, "
Irony is lost on her.
18 posted on
10/12/2017 1:20:36 PM PDT by
lacrew
To: Sub-Driver
At first blush, I agree with it. This president, or any subsequent president, can’t just hit the big red button preemptively.
But past that, you have to ask, how does this change deterrence, pacts with allies, strategy and foreign diplomacy?
More imminently, would it embolden Kim? He already knows he will get destroyed if he actually launches a nuke at a real target, but would he then suddenly consider attacking Seoul with non-nukes now that Trumps hands are tied? I wouldn’t imagine Nuking North Korea if they use conventional weapons on South Korea, but Kim doesn’t need to believe this.
19 posted on
10/12/2017 1:20:51 PM PDT by
z3n
To: Sub-Driver
She is on the top of my list for which of the members of Congress I suspect are getting the alzheimer drug.
20 posted on
10/12/2017 1:22:11 PM PDT by
wattsgnu
To: Sub-Driver
If we define publicly how and when will and won’t use nuclear weapons we set a framework of defense in public stone. It becomes a Maginot Line and wont’ work out any better than it did in 1939.
21 posted on
10/12/2017 1:22:23 PM PDT by
arthurus
(If we publicly define how and when we will use nuclear weapons we set the param)
To: Sub-Driver
Gee Nancy, you could have gotten all the laws you wanted passed when you had the usurper in office and you were the speaker. Now? Not so much.
So sit down, shut up and pay attention Nancy, you’re about to get schooled.
22 posted on
10/12/2017 1:22:30 PM PDT by
Bullish
(Whatever it takes to MAGA)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson