Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Blatantly Obscene Nudity Honored on National Mall
CNS News ^ | 10/11/17 | John Horvat II

Posted on 10/11/2017 9:46:40 AM PDT by markomalley

As statues of historic figures are being defaced and removed, it was only a matter of time before we could expect the same politically-correct tyranny to impose its own statues upon the public. 

That time has come. While anticipated, no one could imagine something so indecent as what is being proposed for one of the most important public spaces in America. The new statue represents no American hero and has no historical significance. Like so many modern artistic representations, this statue is disconnected with anything local. It promotes no positive values.

It is blatantly obscene.

A Shocking Figure Four Stories High

Who would have thought that we would see publicly displayed the naked figure of a woman that towers four-stories high? More shocking is its intended destination. Pending approval from the National Park Service, the colossal statue will be on the National Mall, for four months, facing the White House. With 25 million people visiting the Mall each year, few places can compare in public exposure.  

Ironically, should any Mall visitors present themselves like this sculpture they might well be arrested for violating the District’s public indecency law. The same people who claim Christians impose their morality upon others will force a massive display of immorality upon the passing public. They will further expose countless innocent children to indecency all in the name of “art” and “women’s equality.”

Not About Art or Women’s Equality

Activists linked to the porno-sculpture resist the claim that the figure is yet another exploitive depiction of a woman. Instead, they say the 45-foot-tall female nude will be an opportunity to “start a conversation about violence against women.”

The “artist,” Marco Cochrane contends that figure callously standing exposed allows viewers to imagine a world where women can be safe and live without fear. It is supposed to be humanizing and not sexualizing.

Liberal media are repeating this mantra-like explanation in anticipation of its November 11 installation. It is as if the indecent sculpture is suddenly made decent by the sculptor’s cynical statement.

Mainstreaming Burning Man

Of course, no amount of words can change the indecency of the work. This move is not about art or social commentary. It is about a revolution of transforming America into a society where there is no notion of right or wrong; decent or indecent. Indeed, the massive porno-sculpture is even called “R-Evolution.” The work’s subversive nature is further exposed by the fact that it was created for the counter-cultural Burning Man festival in 2015.

Burning Man is an annual Woodstock-like event outside Reno, Nev., which gathers together a fringe-fest of liberal groups, individuals and causes. It is an event where everything goes—nudity, drugs and promiscuity. What began as a laid-back powwow of cultural misfits has now evolved into a sophisticated spiritual retreat with a veritable who’s who of Silicon Valley executives flying in on their private jets to attend the desert festival. The culmination of the event is the burning of a giant man figure as a symbolic gesture (or catharsis) of renewal and tension release.

Cochrane’s massive sculpture that was also featured at Burning Man will now be the centerpiece of the annual “Catharsis on the Mall” in November. The festival has been called Washington’s “Burning Man.” After the November installation, weekend, organizers will extend the statue’s stay by having volunteers keep watch over it around the clock for four months.

Removing the Barriers of Shame and Modesty

The significance of this shameful installation cannot be underestimated. Burning Man is no longer in the remote desert but in the heart of the nation’s capital. It is exposing millions of visitors to an indecent spectacle that is unavoidable.

Such “art” exhibits have the purpose of removing yet one more barrier of shame and modesty that should protect society from moral decay. Moreover, the Catharsis on the Mall group is holding the Mall hostage by making it off limits to those who still strive to avoid the near occasion of mortal sin. Finally, the four-story porno-sculpture sullies the reputation of America by projecting an image of a shameless nation to visitors and tourists.

A Path to Moral Destruction

Despite the sculptor’s nonsensical pronouncements, everyone knows this work will not advance the cause of women. Wherever nudism has prevailed, it has always led to the degradation of women and the end of civilization. The Church teaches that displays like these represent the degeneration of human dignity. In a society, in which human life is so disregarded, measures should be taken to enhance human dignity not destroy it in the public square.

It is also known that one grave sin leads to yet others. As can be seen in the Burning Man festival, the sin of nudism is linked to other degraded actions that have turned the event into a postmodern Woodstock in which everything is allowed.

We are reminded of ancient Rome, in which secret festivals called Bacchanalia were first held for three days of the year. Later these celebrations became public and were held as often as five times a month. These festivals were so notorious for their orgies that the Roman Senate mostly banned them in 186 BC.

Today there is no Roman Senate to stop such outrages. Silent are the lawmakers who should safeguard the public good and the dignity of the public square. More ominous is the silence of those in the Church who are responsible for the care of souls. They say nothing in the face of this public scandal that cries out for condemnation—a forbidden word in today’s dictatorship of relativism.

Grassroots petitions have circulated, but we are sadly in times when Christians have no voice. Our times reflect a general state of sin and disorder in souls, which is a great offense against God. We are reminded of the message of Our Lady of Fatima who spoke of a great chastisement should mankind fail to stop offending God. She also spoke of sins of impurity that send many to a different burning man festival, one that burns for all eternity.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
More (including representation of statue) can be found here.
1 posted on 10/11/2017 9:46:40 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Harvey Weinstein approves.

Or would if he hasn’t fled to join Roman Polanski.


2 posted on 10/11/2017 9:50:12 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Attack of the 40-Foot Woman: The NC-17 Remake


3 posted on 10/11/2017 9:51:05 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Ummmm - NO!

++++

A 45-foot-tall statue of a nude woman, weighing in at 16,000 pounds, will greet visitors on the Mall for four months if activists have their way.


4 posted on 10/11/2017 9:52:09 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Go head. Objectify them womens


5 posted on 10/11/2017 9:52:13 AM PDT by AppyPappy (Don't mistake your dorm political discussions with the desires of the nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

At least it isn't a statue of Hellary.

6 posted on 10/11/2017 9:54:27 AM PDT by bgill (CDC site, "We don't know how people are infected with Ebola.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
It could be a five foot 16,000 lb statue.

7 posted on 10/11/2017 9:55:50 AM PDT by Waverunner (I'd like to welcome our new overlords, say hello to my little friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

A lot of great pieces of artwork depict nudity.

This is not one of them.


8 posted on 10/11/2017 9:56:00 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

9 posted on 10/11/2017 9:56:15 AM PDT by Slyfox (Are you tired of winning yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Devil’s Advocate here:

Nude statues aren’t necessarily ‘obscene’. I’ve seen plenty of nudes, male and female, that were simply works of art, and obvious as such. Same thing with anatomically-correct statues of animals.

It’s all in the presentation.


10 posted on 10/11/2017 9:56:41 AM PDT by Kriggerel ("All great truths are hard and bitter, but lies... are sweeter than wild honey" (Ragnar Redbeard))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

That’ll drive the muzzies crazy.


11 posted on 10/11/2017 9:57:47 AM PDT by grobdriver (Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
I claim discrimination. I want a 45 foot statue of me naked.

And how many women actually have that figure? Why not a Rosie O'Donnell like figure.

How come it's a white woman?

...

12 posted on 10/11/2017 9:58:10 AM PDT by McGruff (Lock Her Up! In a Padded Cell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

What I’ve seen is not obscene. It’s simply a model of a shapely young woman in a standing pose. There is nothing lascivious, salacious, pernicious or ‘Dirty Girl’ about it.
I know why the sculptor wants to place the figure facing the White House, as though it were a ‘challenge’ of some kind to the president. That logic is pretty weak.
Sometimes a sculpture is just a sculpture.

Remember last year, when Michael Moore’s movie “Trumpland” ended up helping the GOP more than damaging it?
Maybe this little stunt will also have an unexpectedly benign effect.


13 posted on 10/11/2017 9:58:46 AM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill
What about the remake..., I say two statues..

14 posted on 10/11/2017 9:59:01 AM PDT by Waverunner (I'd like to welcome our new overlords, say hello to my little friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
 
 
The old “start a conversation" excuse - unless they're dead, people already know all about that kind of grievance - just another stunt by Trump hating a-holes, trying to keep the misogynist narrative alive.
 
 

15 posted on 10/11/2017 10:03:39 AM PDT by lapsus calami (What's that stink? Code Pink ! ! And their buddy Murtha, too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

LOL, there is always some shmuck, before he gets crushed, just looking up her dress...:)


16 posted on 10/11/2017 10:04:13 AM PDT by rlmorel (Liberals: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Guys - just take a page from the left’s playbook

It makes me FEEL threatened and “triggered”.
So now I can go throw poo, and sheep blood on it.
then cover it with an ISIS flag
and then out some bacon and barbecue ribs on it.

I know - we have mundane responsibilities to fulfill, like work and family. But there has to be a rent-a-mob program to get this done for us.
Suggestions?


17 posted on 10/11/2017 10:04:35 AM PDT by Honest Nigerian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

All I am going to say is, I don’t care if it’shows a giant naked woman or a giant astronaut in a spacesuit. I am not interested in such a huge statue on the lawn of the national mall. Where are they going to put it? In the lawn area to remove grassy space on the lawn? I like the open space!!!


18 posted on 10/11/2017 10:05:22 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I’m far happier having a fake naked woman on the mall than a real pant-suited one in the White House.


19 posted on 10/11/2017 10:05:31 AM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

“they say the 45-foot-tall female nude will be an opportunity to “start a conversation about violence against women.””

Well, doing something which inspires such will indeed do so.


20 posted on 10/11/2017 10:05:48 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson