Skip to comments.
Democratic IT scandal takes an interesting turn
American Thinker ^
| 09/10/2017
| Rick Moran
Posted on 10/10/2017 1:47:53 PM PDT by detective
The "non-scandal" scandal involving a former I.T. aide to several Democratic congressmen, including Debbie Wasserman Schultz, took an interesting turn when the wife of the alleged hacker and fraudster Imran Awan showed up in court separate from her husband and had retained a separate attorney.
Imran Awan's own wife, Hina Alvi, filed papers in a Pakistani court accusing her husband of fraud and of marrying another woman. The couple did not look at each other when they showed up in federal court on Friday.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: akram; alias; awan; awanbrothers; classifieddocuments; congress; democrats; dnc; fraud; fusiongps; hsbc; imranawan; itgate; lahore; muhammadakram; ngpvan; pakistan; phonebooth; polygamy; schultz; shehzadi; siddique; spyring; sumairashehzadi; sumairasiddique; wassermanschultz
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Congressional Democrats and the Obama administration colluded to provide classified documents to the Pakistan intelligence agency.
1
posted on
10/10/2017 1:47:53 PM PDT
by
detective
To: detective
Wow! DWS sh*tting bricks.
2
posted on
10/10/2017 1:50:31 PM PDT
by
Tea Party Terrorist
(Why work for a living when you can vote for a living?)
To: detective
What I.T. scandal? Everyone knows it was the Russians....
To: detective
From Wikipedia:
"Under U.S. federal common law, the spousal testimonial privilege is held by the witness-spouse, not the party-spouse, and therefore does not prevent a spouse who wishes to testify from doing so. The rationale of this rule is that if a witness-spouse desires to testify against the party-spouse, there is no marital harmony left to protect through the obstruction of such testimony."
4
posted on
10/10/2017 1:56:22 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: detective
filed papers in a Pakistani court accusing her husband of fraud and of marrying another woman Is that illegal in Pakistan?
5
posted on
10/10/2017 1:59:40 PM PDT
by
libertylover
(We EXPECT RESPECT for the flag and anthem.)
To: detective
Oh man, NOW he’s in trouble!
6
posted on
10/10/2017 2:01:06 PM PDT
by
polymuser
(Enough is enough.)
To: detective
Gosh, this is turning out to be as much fun as the Anthony Weiner scandal.
7
posted on
10/10/2017 2:02:13 PM PDT
by
billorites
(freepo ergo sum)
To: libertylover
Wonder if he wired the $$ to a side chick?
To: Steely Tom
Yep, she can testify against him. That should be enough to put some pressure on. She might be precluded from testifying to any marital communications. Different rule.
9
posted on
10/10/2017 2:03:31 PM PDT
by
jimfree
(My17 y/o granddaughter continues to have more quality exec experience than an 8 year Obama.)
To: detective
The biggest spyring in U.S. history and they call it an “IT scandal.”
10
posted on
10/10/2017 2:04:47 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(0bama. The Legacy is a lie. The lie is the Legacy.)
To: jimfree
Yep, she can testify against him. That should be enough to put some pressure on. She might be precluded from testifying to any marital communications. Different rule. Yes, but only in court, and only during a proceeding that puts her husband in jeopardy, correct?
They want to nail him for espionage and any number of other items, but the real targets are above him.
The first to squeal gets the deal.
11
posted on
10/10/2017 2:08:33 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
To: detective
It would nice if someone would clarify: Is it the “DEMOCRAT” Party or the “DEMOCRATIC” PARTY.
12
posted on
10/10/2017 2:10:58 PM PDT
by
RichyTea
(To those offended - take off your blinders)
To: RichyTea
Without the ick, the Democrat Party wouldn’t exist.
If you’re a Republican, you’re from the Republican Party.
If you’re a Dummycrat, you’re from the Dumbcrap Party.
To: definitelynotaliberal
14
posted on
10/10/2017 2:19:02 PM PDT
by
RichyTea
(To those offended - take off your blinders)
To: TigersEye
“The biggest spyring in U.S. history and they call it an “IT scandal.”
I’m surprised that they didn’t just call it an “IT glitch”.
.
15
posted on
10/10/2017 2:21:24 PM PDT
by
Mears
To: RichyTea
Is it the “DEMOCRAT” Party or the “DEMOCRATIC” PARTY. It's simply the "RATs"
It was self-chosen in reaction to a GWB campaign commercial where the word "democrat" scrolled across the screen, and the syllable "rat" was the last to disappear.
They whacked....it stuck.
16
posted on
10/10/2017 2:22:11 PM PDT
by
ROCKLOBSTER
(RATs, RINOs...same thing)
To: detective
17
posted on
10/10/2017 2:22:43 PM PDT
by
KSCITYBOY
(The media is corrupt)
To: detective
Hoping the wife has a security team assigned to protect her 24/7.
18
posted on
10/10/2017 2:31:51 PM PDT
by
NautiNurse
(Tear down the Mexican Carrier plant and use the materials to build the wall)
To: detective
In the Daily Caller I read the wife filed a Pakistani criminal complaint that he married someone else without permission or justification.
19
posted on
10/10/2017 2:35:26 PM PDT
by
\/\/ayne
(I regret that I have but one subscription cancellation notice to give to my local newspaper.)
To: Mears
No kidding. Frankly I’m surprised they even arrested Imran.
20
posted on
10/10/2017 2:41:04 PM PDT
by
TigersEye
(0bama. The Legacy is a lie. The lie is the Legacy.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson