“Christian Post: YouTube Just Demonetized Hundreds of Our Videos”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3579775/posts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“Diamond and Silk rip YouTube, say 95% of videos demonetized over Trump support”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3576177/posts
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“Conservative And Independent YouTube Channels Hit By Censorship And Demonetization”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“YouTube Just Demonetized Hundreds of Our Videos”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
“The Demonetization of YouTube is Fast Underway; Dissidents Will Be Silenced”
This could open up a business oppty for some entrepreneur.
Maybe the has come to call in the lawyers.
YOU TUBE their decisions based no more/no less than decisions made by Bakers and photographers and wedding events. Why government steps in to snap the hands of one side yet not the other?
It was thought when TWITTER was introduced that Facebook might amend its policy. Now they are two horses in the same barn.
YOU TUBE needs some competition. IMMEDIATELY! (period)
YouTube parent - Alphabet (better known as Google - has consistently (for years) done massive lobbying in Congress, and directly with Obama and his FCC, extolling the necessity for “net neutrality”, arguing that some players were so big in the Internet world how they do and don’t allow Internet traffic had to be regulated or the little guy wouldn’t stand a chance.
Meanwhile, Google NEVER was practicing what it preached - “net neutrality”, and now is acting as the de fact Big Brother censor - exactly what Google argued the telecoms would do if they weren’t regulated.
I think it is time Google became the de facto public utility it wanted the telecoms to become, and with that get TRUE net neutrality regulated into what it can and cannot do, so the little guy is not silenced just because Google doesn’t like their view.
Considering their extreme left wing political activism, they are not conducive to a democratic society.
Many years ago Limbaugh referenced something I sent him as well.
I know this because back in the day I (1) knew his fax number which he rarely gave out and (2) likely the reason he rarely gave it out was because at that time he used his Mac to receive faxes and there was some bug so that when he received a fax the printer had to be manually halted or it would keep spitting out paper ... something he may have mentioned only once on the air but which I and others listening right then heard. He also indicated, at least at that time, that he was the one stopping the printer.
I used this knowledge on a number of occasions because it increased the odds that he would see his faxes. Especially if, I reasoned, they were legibly hand written.
So, one day it had been revealed that Bill Clinton’s campaign had taken money from pornographers and he’d been asked if he was going to return the money. Clinton gave some cryptic reason about refusing some money causing other money to have more influence that had folks flummoxed. I realized he was talking about money given to opposing candidates, not himself, and faxed that in.
After a few minutes Rush referenced having recieved an explanation, just not by name.
So congratulations to this lady, especially the by name recognition, and I’m sorry she has to suffer the slings and arrows of outrageous Commiecrats, militant Poofters and other so-called progressives.
I presume this means Google is no longer running ads on her channel.
Fascist book.
Sue to crap out of that Zuckerberg Commie.
Didn’t youtube do the same thing to Diamond & SilK? The hilarious Trump supporting sisters/ladies?
Youtube has too much power. Pure monopoly power, anti-trust issue.
Pulling the same shit Johnny D Rockefeller did to competitors. Crushing them.
“YouTube does not allow anyone to dispute the demonetization strikes unless the video in question receives 1000 views in the next seven days (go watch it—now!).”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=To1MoY8p9UY&feature=youtu.be
Time for RICO lawsuit.
This one does not censor. David Seaman basically abandoned youtube for this one.