Hmm. Methinks the Clinton Foundation used the SPLC as their model for hiding money and pretending to do good.
But the Clintons eventually surpassed the SPLC in the depth and cunningness of their corruption and criminal success.
The Clintons set up their Foundation in Canada to avoid any financial disclosure of who their donors are.
Plus they put a certain Secretary of State at the pivot point to push contribution to the “charity” by actively asked for money from foreign governments.
The other unique twist was to take down the Libyan government so they could increase those “charitable” donations by exorting dictators as they id in Morocco.
Then there was the uranium deal to enable the Russians to own a corner on America’s uranium supply. Real nifty one there, Hill and Bill.
Cleverest trick of all ( and aided by Barkie Mau Mau Boobamba ) was to hijack relief efforts in the wake of Haiti’s earthquake tragedy and to use relief money to buttress crony companies like mobile operator Digicel while throwing peanuts to the starving people of Haiti.
Add it up and there’s no contest. The Clinton Foundation beats the SPLC hands down. The Clinton Foundation is still the number one criminal “fake-do-gooder” foundation in the world.
And many of these things I’ve said I learned from your fine posts, Liz.
The Secretary's itinierary is top secret---for safety reasons.
Having the itinerary gave conniving Billybooboo an opportunity to figure out the next global insider deals to pursue to make the Clintons richer.