Instead of banning them how about we just increase the penalty for commit a crime with such devices on your weapons????
Er, the penalty for murder is pretty high. Dont think Chicago kids are robbing delis with this.
If someone’s gonna crack, they usually go all out.
Not to sound like a liberal weasel, but the founding fathers didn’t know there were gonna be guns that shoot 4 billion rounds a minute!!!
Hard to take out sixty people with a musket :)
I assume most here think this incident is the price you pay for freedom.
I painfully admit that is likely the answer.
Booze on convenience stores shelves and “medications” being sold by pharma are killing a #### of a lot more people than the people using these guns.
Increase the penalty how? So if you kill someone with a bump-stocked rifle, you get...what? Instead of the death penalty or life in prison (depending on the state), you get more death sentence or more life sentence? Not really sure how that works.
Reminds me of the false whining when Bush ran for president and they complained about the dragging death and how the victims got off lightly with only a death sentence, and how a hate crime law Bush didn't pass would have given the bad guys...what... I don't know. More death?
In non-lethal encounters, I don't care what kind of stock you have or if it's semi or full auto, I would think you'd be in big trouble either way, so... just saying.
“Instead of banning them how about we just increase the penalty for commit a crime with such devices on your weapons????”
That’s not much of a deterrent against those who aren’t fazed by the fact that they may get the death penalty for killing someone in the first place.