Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: doug from upland

This is one angle of the story that makes the guy’s plan seem amateurish. I don’t know anyone over the age of 8 who would even think that a bullet would penetrate the exterior of a fuel tank like that.


4 posted on 10/04/2017 8:14:11 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child
This is one angle of the story that makes the guy’s plan seem amateurish. I don’t know anyone over the age of 8 who would even think that a bullet would penetrate the exterior of a fuel tank like that.

A 300 Win Mag or 338 Lapua would but it would just cause a leak and no explosion. Perhaps even a minor fire.

9 posted on 10/04/2017 8:28:43 PM PDT by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud-man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist, CONSTITUTION WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

“I don’t know anyone over the age of 8 who would even think that a bullet would penetrate the exterior of a fuel tank like that”

Depends on caliber, bullet weight and velocity at impact.

A .308 at 30ft might get through...a .338 Lupua at 30 ft most certainly would.

5.56 at 700yds would barely pass through a bean can.


17 posted on 10/04/2017 8:49:22 PM PDT by Mariner (Pink Pussy Hats for the NFL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child
This is one angle of the story that makes the guy’s plan seem amateurish. I don’t know anyone over the age of 8 who would even think that a bullet would penetrate the exterior of a fuel tank like that.

It is laughable and displays the ignorance of the media "experts". The supposed “experts” on FOX tonight were blathering on and on about this and how lucky it was that the tanks didn't explode. The fact that the guy was apparently wasting his ammo shooting at these fuel tanks is a sign that this probably was not an operation planned by professionals from a foreign intelligence agency. So this probably was not an act of war perpetrated by a foreign government.

These tanks can explode when hit by an artillery shell or a bomb because the tank is ruptured and a vapor cloud is formed. However if a tiny bullet from a 223 or even a larger 30 caliber rifle was to penetrate a tank full of “jet fuel” aka “kerosene” it most likely wouldn't do anything other than possibly cause the tank to leak. The fuel to air mixture would be very unlikely to be in the right proportion to support combustion. In normal temperatures if the part of the tank that the bullet penetrated had less than 95% air in it... the mixture would be too rich to burn. Even if somehow it did start some of the contents on fire, the air would be consumed quickly and the pressure release apparatus would most likely release any gasses formed before the tank was damaged.

21 posted on 10/04/2017 8:53:45 PM PDT by fireman15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

” I don’t know anyone over the age of 8 who would even think that a bullet would penetrate the exterior of a fuel tank like that.”

Maybe it was some of those cop killer, armor piercing bullets that Clinton, Warren, Feinstein, and Bloomberg talk so much about.


24 posted on 10/04/2017 9:00:25 PM PDT by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

Definitely not from that distance.


31 posted on 10/04/2017 9:49:08 PM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson