Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mulvaney: I wouldn't take Trump 'word for word' that he will wipe out Puerto Rico's debt
The Hill ^ | 10/04/2017 | REBECCA SAVRANSKY

Posted on 10/04/2017 6:22:54 AM PDT by GIdget2004

White House budget chief Mick Mulvaney said Wednesday he wouldn't take President Trump's comments about wiping out Puerto Rico's debt "word for word."

"I wouldn't take it work for word with that," he said.

"I talked the president about this at some length yesterday as we flew home on Air Force One."

Mulvaney said now, the administration is focused on making sure the island is safe and "that we're rebuilding the island."

"Dealing with the challenges that Puerto Rico had, the island is at least $72 billion in debt, $120 if you go by other counts, before the storm," he said.

"We are going to focus our attention right now on rebuilding the island, repairing the island, making sure everybody is safe and that we get through this difficult times."

Mulvaney said right now, the administration doesn't want to deal with the "fundamental difficulties" Puerto Rico had before the storm.

Trump said Tuesday that the U.S. would have to “wipe out” Puerto Rico’s multi-billion dollar debt after Hurricane Maria.

"They owe a lot of money to your friends on Wall Street and we're going to have to wipe that out," Trump said during an interview with Fox News. "You can say goodbye to that."

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mulvaney; puertoricodebt; trumpbudget; trumpfema; trumppuertoricodebt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 10/04/2017 6:22:54 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Bill Clinton so loved Puerto Rico, that he and the Dem controlled congress got rid of tax breaks for US based businesses and manufacturers that eliminated either import or other taxes of PR produced products coming into the mainland that the businesses left PR and the economy crashed, leaving it what it is today.


2 posted on 10/04/2017 6:31:09 AM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

No fed bailout for p r. Any storm rebuilding by the feds to be strictly on a loan basis.


3 posted on 10/04/2017 6:32:14 AM PDT by chief lee runamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

They can’t pay back the loans they aready have. Why give them any more?


4 posted on 10/04/2017 6:36:55 AM PDT by Poison Pill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004; cll

My impression is that the PR’s economy took a hit when they ended the tax breaks given to industries that located there. Being that they are 500 miles out into the ocean, there are added costs to any enterprise located there, which the tax breaks sought to offset. NAFTA, for example, was viewed as hurting PR as it encouraged companies to look south of the border rather than out into the Atlantic.

Heavy industry would probably never locate there, but light industry did before and could again. Of course, we still have the problem of getting companies to stop fleeing to China, which is a lot further away than San Juan.

Still... there may be other things they can do to turn things around besides just restructuring the debt.


5 posted on 10/04/2017 6:37:25 AM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poison Pill

Why give charity, setting precedent? Especially to a proven inept governmental system.


6 posted on 10/04/2017 6:43:36 AM PDT by chief lee runamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Strategy. Open the extremes as possible, persuade people to negotiate generously. Give creditors a reason to work out a good solution, rather than just demanding eternal interest payments.


7 posted on 10/04/2017 6:47:40 AM PDT by ctdonath2 (It's not "white privilege", it's "Puritan work ethic". Behavior begets consequences.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Gee, maybe Trump will also wipe-out my debt.


8 posted on 10/04/2017 6:47:54 AM PDT by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Trump’s a business man. He says what he feels, when he says it, then forms policy later.


9 posted on 10/04/2017 6:51:30 AM PDT by struggle (The)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
$72 billion in debt, $120 if you go by other counts, before the storm

Is that a misprint or a real number? how can so few people get so deep in debt?

10 posted on 10/04/2017 6:52:21 AM PDT by Bob Celeste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marron

US and European manufactures would rather go to China than PR for the same reason they prefer China to Africa, WORK ETHIC.


11 posted on 10/04/2017 6:54:26 AM PDT by Bob Celeste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bob Celeste

Banks who know the feds will bail them out.

And note that PR’s power monopoly gives away a lot of free electricity to government units and others politically connected, to the point where a bunch of that total debt belongs to them.


12 posted on 10/04/2017 6:56:45 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

This was just Trump’s opening salvo in renegotiating the debt on their behalf. Notice he didn’t say the U.S. was going to bail them out. He said, “Whoever, Goldman Sachs, get ready, pfft, it’s gone.”


13 posted on 10/04/2017 6:57:08 AM PDT by cincinnati65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob Celeste

According to my friend who grew up there the political parties on the island are beyond corrupt and both managed to piss away all of the receipts of the pharm tax break windfall they once enjoyed on worthless government jobs for every relative and friend you can imagine.


14 posted on 10/04/2017 6:57:42 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

There ought to be incentives for private investment to rebuild their infrastructure. A private company needs to run the power company, toll roads with a discounted toll for natives would mostly be paid for by tourists. Get a bunch of resorts to build (anywhere but San Juan) if they build to withstand any future hurricane that island would be a great playground. Maria may have actually done a favor by wiping out homes that are unfit to withstand a storm if they are replaced by homes that are sturdy.


15 posted on 10/04/2017 7:00:28 AM PDT by McGavin999 ("The press is impotent when it abandons itself to falsehood."Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Thanks I appreciate it, but 70 to 120 billion?


16 posted on 10/04/2017 7:01:03 AM PDT by Bob Celeste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

I hope you’re wrong about the bailout.


17 posted on 10/04/2017 7:01:31 AM PDT by Bob Celeste
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Bob Celeste

I don’t recall Trump setting a specific timeline for bailing out Puerto Rico’s debt or did I miss that date?


18 posted on 10/04/2017 7:13:52 AM PDT by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bob Celeste

Catholics tend to have very large families. ;o)


19 posted on 10/04/2017 7:37:02 AM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: chief lee runamok

According to Mulvaney Trump’s not talking about a federal bailout. He’s talking about a debt restructuring similar to bankruptcy. It’s the Wall St. banks that loaned them the money that would have to take the hit. The ones who made the bad loans in the first place. He’s recognizing the reality that there’s no realistic way for PR to pay them back.


20 posted on 10/04/2017 7:39:59 AM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism without Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson