Posted on 09/23/2017 6:24:24 AM PDT by Kaslin
All around the Federal Reserve building, someone for years has been riding his horse—a la Paul Revere—crying out in excitement over the notion that 2 percent inflation is finally coming. This week, Janet Yellen has finally gotten to where many other Central Bankers around the world already are—it’s not happening.
We’re not even close. Especially since we haven’t seen any real, sustainable increases in the Producer Price Index (PPI) or the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Indeed, the European Central Bank leaders (along with the Fed) have been throwing everything they possibly can at inflation, and it doesn’t seem to move. The only thing that will move it is sustainable, global GDP growth.
I know that no consumers or governments want excessive inflation. But without increases to PPI and CPI, instituting wage increases without companies taking a hit on their bottom line is impossible; hence, it’s been nearly 16 years since we’ve seen any real wage increases.
One would think the labor force is about as tight as it can get at 4.4 percent unemployment, but also remember that we have a 40-year low in labor participation. We need some of this labor to begin to participate in a growing economy—not to mention that we need to see sustainable increases in PPI as a result of GDP growth and a tightening labor force before we will ever see any real growth or wage increases.
I know it is nearly impossible for those living in the Washington, D.C. bubble to think about unintended consequences. Most of the brilliant economists on Capitol Hill believe the labor participation rate as it stands today is the new normal. They must think millions of people (even those between the ages of 16 and 55) have all retired and are sitting on the beach or playing golf.
If that is true, there is no way we will have a labor force that will be able to keep pace with a growing economy. Such an economy will put demands on this limited workforce—at least until there is balance in employment. If President Trump’s economic team is correct, then it is very likely we will have a labor crisis that could stifle our ability to sustain GDP growth.
Streamlining immigration reform must happen at the same time GDP is growing. Yes, there will need to be some important milestones that every legal immigrant must meet before becoming a citizen; the vetting process must be priority No. 1. But if our leaders are right about the labor participation in this country being the new normal, they had better get moving with immigration reform.
However, if the so-called new normal of labor participation is inaccurate, then we better incentivize those who are out of the labor market to return to the workforce. The best way to do that is to carefully examine the broken system that is supporting so many people under the age of 55—and hope that this group desires to become productive citizens again by offering them opportunities for prosperity for themselves and their families.
We have been somewhat shortsighted when it comes to pushing economic stimulus as we seek to develop ways to keep companies here and bring new companies to America. Such a push will not be sustainable if we can’t promise those employers a strong, ready and willing workforce.
Our leaders in Washington seem to have a huge problem with understanding cause-and-effect. There was a time when the Federal Reserve and other organizations had to consider the effect of underlying causes, not simply default to textbook scenarios.
Certainly, there is a relationship between PPI increases, inflation, and wage increases, but if the Federal Reserve, along with some government agencies, believe we will see higher wages without PPI, GDP growth and a tightened labor market—think again. Maybe we will see consumer confidence and consumer spending increase without wage growth, but it’s not likely.
In the big picture, companies are not anxious to lower their profit margins by raising wages without consumer prices increasing as well. Now, prices remain flat globally, and we are importing deflation. Growth simply will not be sustainable without increases in GDP. No matter what, the U.S. and global economy will dictate interest rates and monetary policy—even though central banks around the world believe they have all the answers.
Unfortunately, the sluggish growth of our economy is not the fault of the Federal Reserve. It’s all about our failed legislators doing nothing. And that is something to get very nervous about. If your wages are not going up, don’t look to the Federal Reserve, your human resources department, a corporate board, the president of the company or the owner of the small business.
The next time you walk into a voting booth, take a long, hard look at the ballot.
If you’ve been to the grocery store lately, you know inflation isn’t coming. It’s here!
Banks are in much better shape today than they were in 2007.
And the homeless suddenly reappeared on January 20th, after 12 noon.....
Pay college tuition. inflation is here.
I wouldn’t worry about a small work force. I’d worry about finding a real job in the first place, no matter what your skillset.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Pq-S557XQU
“Unfortunately, the sluggish growth of our economy is not the fault of the Federal Reserve. It’s all about our failed legislators doing nothing.”
Or doing too much.
Take currency out of the equation whenever possible.
We’re not even close. Especially since we haven’t seen any real, sustainable increases in the Producer Price Index (PPI) or the Consumer Price Index (CPI). Indeed, the European Central Bank leaders (along with the Fed) have been throwing everything they possibly can at inflation, and it doesn’t seem to move. The only thing that will move it is sustainable, global GDP growth.
...
Growth may cause price increases, but it doesn’t cause inflation. Inflation is caused by devaluation of the currency.
The only beef I can afford is ground beef when on sale. Bacon is over 5 bucks a pound. No inflation.....
The definition of inflation is to many dollars chasing to few goods. Econ 101.
With modern technology, we can produce as many goods and commodities as we require, with very little effort. Economists don’t seem to have grasped this yet.
Bacon prices are puzzling me. They shot up really fast but pork in general seems to be holding steady. That makes no sense to this non-farmer.
Excellent point.
I saw a pound of Oscar Meyer bacon for $8.49/pd? WTH? I heard the Chinese have caught the bacon bug. All of our bacon is going over there now casing bacon inflation.
“too”
English 101
> If you’ve been to the grocery store lately, you know inflation isn’t coming. It’s here! <
Food prices go up, and package sizes get smaller. But there is no inflation! That’s because the consumer price index (CPI) does not consider products in the energy and food sectors.
Those products cause “temporary price shocks”, so their price increases are simply ignored. Pretty clever, eh?
If you’ve been to the grocery store lately, you know inflation isn’t coming. It’s here!
***********
Very true. It is also true that the political elites don’t go to grocery stores. The can vote raises for themselves so inflation is not a concern for them.
This makes zero sense. If the wage increase comes solely from inflation, then by definition it is not a "real" (inflation adjusted) increase. The primary reasons why there haven't been wage increases is that more of the compensation is in non-wage benefits like insurance and immigration keeping wages down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.