Both parties have been carrying out a 30 year bipartisan policy of non-enforcement of laws and borders with the goal of changing the demographic makeup of this country.
The only difference is for Democrats, displacing working and middle class white Americans is an end goal in itself, whereas for Republicans, this is just something that has to be done to keep down the cost of labor (with the understanding, of course, that the elites will never be the ones to be displaced by illegals or by H1B visa recipients).
“Both parties have been carrying out a 30 year bipartisan policy of non-enforcement of laws and borders with the goal of changing the demographic makeup of this country.”
Ding, ding, ding, we have a winner! And let’s not leave out making $hit loads of money personally by supporting the globalists at the US Chamber of Communists and the Business Roundtable. Their slogan: “Wallets Uber Alles!”
Sounds pretty close to treason, does it not?
Or is the reason something deeper, more profound, touching on a topic that is almost never discussed among non-scientists? I'm speaking about the 3 horsemen: resource depletion, environmental degradation and population overshoot.
In an environment of resource scarcity, it necessarily results that there will be conflict over diminishing returns. The winners will be those who evolved certain traits & attributes that resulted in the greatest domination during periods of surplus. I'm speaking of course about those that exhibit self reliance, individual initiative, impulse control, deferred gratification, the whole gamut of what has typically been characterized as attributes of successful "winners".
But now we have a coordinated propaganda onslaught that diminishes these type of accomplishments, attempts to erase histories of achievement, and instead elevates and celebrates the desultory, indolent and violent. Why?
Why is because with a globe armed with nukes, any conflict could easily escalate beyond the confines of the local regional area. What does it gain mankind that a certain race of achievers are willing to put the entire global population at risk in order to continue to satisfy their own (selfish) needs?
Wouldn't it be preferable, from an animal husbandry perspective, to manage the entire global herd as one homogeneous mass that has controlled birthrates, consumption and pollution? But, as we can see, it's always difficult to change the expectations of those who have grow to assume benefits as a birthright, in essence, an entitlement. In many ways, this fits exactly Darwin's term of 'fit'. It doesn't mean best or strongest, but rather simply the best (current) fit given the environment constraints. Perhaps those who were best fit during periods of surplus are now considered unfit, because of their voracious energy requirements and mental expectations.
So, rather than try and convince people of impending doom (watch the responses from the xians on FR), it's simply easier to remove them from the discussion aka gene pool. Substituting people with an average IQ in the range of 85 (blacks) to 92 (hispanics & muzzies) is a lot easier than trying to persuade your average IQ 100 American that he/she has to take a seat for the rest of the world. Even better, if you import people with no previous history or tradition of self-government, then you have a built in audience ready for centralized, authoritarian control.
That's my explanation. I don't bother debating "if" population replacement is occurring or if it's the goal of the elites. It's self evident to anyone with even the slightest clue. Rather, I think the debate is going to move to the question of "why"?