Excerpted per rules.
Just because conservatives don't worship gaia doesn't mean they don't go in for good stewardship.
To: Jagermonster
The article seems to conflate conservationists with environmentalists. I don’t buy the premise. Conservation is focused, ie, panthers. Environmentalism wants to control inputs, outputs and anything related thereto.
2 posted on
09/18/2017 4:50:23 PM PDT by
sparklite2
(I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
To: Jagermonster
They couldn't help themselves - they had to stick in a sea-level rise comment:
"In the 21st century, the Virginia Chesapeake has experienced sea-level rise of 3 to 5 millimeters per year a rate that exceeds the global average. The regions gradually sinking land makes the area more vulnerable than many other coastal regions, says the US Geological Survey, causing this rate to likely triple in coming decades." (Emphasis added).
Note the bold - sea level, must, by its physical nature, be the same worldwide. Perhaps that subsiding land may account for the entire measurement?
3 posted on
09/18/2017 4:52:45 PM PDT by
Jagermonster
(TANSTAAFL)
To: Jagermonster
Exactly...habitat destruction is real. Just as EPA wacko over reach is real...
5 posted on
09/18/2017 5:04:57 PM PDT by
wyowolf
(Be ware when the preachers take over the Republican party...)
To: Jagermonster
The whole purpose of conservatives is to conserve the liberties of the Constitution.
6 posted on
09/18/2017 5:09:30 PM PDT by
libertylover
(Inhabitants of Earth with any freedom probably have the USA to thank.)
To: Jagermonster
I remember going out on the Chesapeake Bay on the “Question Mark” in 1956. There was a raw oyster bar on board. I suppose they caught them from the boat.
7 posted on
09/18/2017 5:25:42 PM PDT by
Arthur McGowan
(https://youtu.be/IYUYya6bPGw)
To: Jagermonster
The article seems to have one major intention - to bow to the “climate change agenda”.
“In the 21st century, the Virginia Chesapeake has experienced sea-level rise of 3 to 5 millimeters per year a rate that exceeds the global average.”
This is false and not real science. It comes from uncorrected data that includes data taken from instruments that do not account for subsidence on the Chesapeakes shores; which in many places has been substantial. When corrected for the missing subsidence data, the “sea level rise” is negligible.
9 posted on
09/18/2017 6:43:18 PM PDT by
Wuli
To: Jagermonster
Rappahannock & Piankatank rivers bump ..
11 posted on
09/19/2017 5:20:44 AM PDT by
ßuddaßudd
(>> M A G A << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
To: Jagermonster; All
So I do a lot of corporate events. I’ve noticed (between that and news) that the most effective and useful conservationists tend to be hunters/hunting groups. A real conservative, by nature, believes in proper use of land and maintaining a proper exploit-preserve balance.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson