Posted on 09/13/2017 4:00:10 PM PDT by Innovative
Former national security adviser Susan Rice privately told House investigators that she unmasked the identities of senior Trump officials to understand why the crown prince of the United Arab Emirates was in New York late last year, multiple sources told CNN. The New York meeting preceded a separate effort by the UAE to facilitate a back-channel communication between Russia and the incoming Trump White House.
The New York meeting preceded a separate effort by the UAE to facilitate a back-channel communication between Russia and the incoming Trump White House.
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
Nonsense. Complete BS.
Gowdy will believe anything.
According to the MSM/Democrat narrative, the Russian - Trump back channel had been in operation for months.
The GOP and Demonrats just keep pissing in the swamp and dumping more raw sewage into it.
AND Gowdy, same old same old. He never met a lobbyist he did not like.
“everything needs to be out......just as long as it will hurt Trump.”....
The news media, 99 % of odumbo appointees all want to undermine Trump and in doing so are destroying this country. Every one of them needs to be immediately dumped into the trash heap ASAP, NO HOLD OVERS.
I am not satisfied with this unmasking. She didn’t have the right.
This is weak. Gowdy needs to explain why constitutional rights were trampled.
If the Trump people had been colluding with Russia before the election, then why the need to establish back channel communications with Russia after the election?
gowdy is mr. kabuki. What a flaccid pathetic joke.
What a crock.Where is the GRAND JURY??? Where is Sessions?
Why didn’t she just ask the Crown Prince why he was here? What a bogus reason for unmasking American citizens.
Rice is a proven serial liar.
The fact that Gowdy believes this tells as much
about Gowdy, as it does Rice.
It is a crock.
Gowdy will investigate forever and never find anything, what a dipshit!
yep. This is not what we voted to see.
Click the Pics & Text |
And he has a history to prove this.
CNN articles now get posted as real news?
Every incoming U.S. president in my life time had, I don’t doubt, some attempt somewhere to have their own “back channel” communication line to an ally, or adversary (or adversaries) to have conversations unfiltered by the incumbent administration during the transition.
Such a back channel by itself presumes nothing wrong about it.
How does CNN know what Susan Rice told investigators in private?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.