Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex-employees allege Macy’s profiles Asian customers: suit
New York Post ^ | September 8, 2017 | Kaja Whitehouse

Posted on 09/10/2017 8:31:42 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement

After settling allegations that it unlawfully detained black customers, Macy’s is now picking on Asians, according to a lawsuit filed by four former employees of the company’s flagship store in Herald Square.

Managers in the cosmetics and fragrance department of Macy’s flagship store “repeatedly directed … sales associates to racially profile customers of Asian descent” out of fear that they were secretly black marketers, according to a Manhattan federal lawsuit.

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: lawsuit; macys; marketing; prolifing; racist; retail; trump
Will "black marketers" be racially insensitive?
1 posted on 09/10/2017 8:31:42 PM PDT by ConservativeStatement
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

It’s not like Macy’s sold this stuff that cheaply anyway!


2 posted on 09/10/2017 8:35:28 PM PDT by Skywise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

I guess I miss the point - if the Asians buy stuff from their store, what do they care about what those Asians do with it. It’s not like the situation with black customers.


3 posted on 09/10/2017 8:43:41 PM PDT by BobL (In Honor of the NeverTrumpers, I declare myself as FR's first 'Imitation NeverTrumper')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

“Don’t sell to Chinese,” one manager told employees, according to the complaint. ““Why are you selling to these people?” another sales person said she was told...

Asian customers are resellers – that is, Asian customers buy goods in markets like the U.S. and resell them on the grey market at a markup in Asia,” according to the lawsuit filed by Douglas Wigdor.


Why does it matter if they resell it?


4 posted on 09/10/2017 8:48:35 PM PDT by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

Another Amazon customer is born.


5 posted on 09/10/2017 9:01:49 PM PDT by sparklite2 (I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

Comparing Asians to Africans is like comparing apples to crustaceans. I know people that worked for Dillards. Africans were the demographic most likely to steal. The cameras and staff proved it a 100 to 1 over the nearest competitor. Notice what demographic is leading the looting rampage in the hurricane areas.


6 posted on 09/11/2017 4:43:02 AM PDT by Neoliberalnot (Marxism works well only with the uneducated and the unarmed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

I call BS

It is far easier to make fake stuff in Asia and counterfeit the jars an labels.

Buying over the counter one at a time and exporting and then expecting to make a profit is unlikely


7 posted on 09/11/2017 4:48:56 AM PDT by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neoliberalnot

There’s a difference between shoplifting and organized retail crime. I can’t find any stats on race or ethnicity for the latter. That info might explain a lot.


8 posted on 09/11/2017 4:52:23 AM PDT by mewzilla (Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

As someone with some security background, I think it’s important to note that security policies generally result from observations and statistics.

That stated, this story is nothing but a representation of continued defective public policy to erase all bias on the basis of color while completely ignorant of the statistics themselves.

The Portland gang database story is but one example of this trend.

Truth is a tough nut to crack. This is why progressives make it up as they go.


9 posted on 09/11/2017 6:28:13 AM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeStatement

Is this another case of mere “disparate impact” where the only implication of discrimination is just the facts - that statistically one demographic group or another has a higher or lower number of cases?

Could it possibly be, for some unaccountable reasons more of the perps actually happen to come from some demographic groups more than others?

No. Why? Because “diversity” rules REQUIRE than all things ONLY occur, NATURALLY, in demographic relationships that are completely proportionate to each demographic group’s proportion of the general population. ANYTHING ELSE MUST BE due to some kind of discrimination. Right? /sarc


10 posted on 09/11/2017 7:46:54 AM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson