Article image
Article image
Conclusion first. Examine evidence second.
The Theory cannot and will not be challenged. Uncomfortable evidence will be ignored, disavowed, or squeezed into the existing theory.
Obviously time travelers.
THis article demonstrated that the Creative Science bunch can read ANYTHING and come up with totally ridiculous conclusions.
The data indicates that an earlier HOMINID was walking around on Crete a lot earlier than expected. But the Crete of that period was attached to north Africa and the Levant. Some anthropologist believe bipedalism arose separately several times in the Primate line. And the evolution of Hominids, as recent genetic studies have indicated, is far more complex than earlier thought.
And, yes, I believe in God and the Bible. And NO, there is no conflict between that and evolution.
SHEEESH
"It's not easy being marginalized again and again by the scientific community"
Blows away the 6,000 year-old Earth story, too.
We're using our God-given intelligence to reasonably examine God's creation to make sense of what we see, and these twits contribute nothing but twist anything they can into "see? 10,000 years max!" Just look up, and it's pretty obvious that what we see can't possibly fit into 10,000 years. We don't know everything, that's why we're trying to make sense of it. "The heavens attest to God's glory!" indeed they do, and in doing so make clear God did a whole lot more than "just spoke".
OK, so some hominid made tracks a long time ago. Pretty clear those weren't "human" tracks.
We’re eventually going to discover that there are significant flaws or errors in how we date these ancient fossils and discoveries.
I’m not saying the earth is only 6,000 years old, I’m just saying conclusively dating anything as X millions of years old is suspect.
Bfl
Clearly, this is the evidence we have been waiting for.
We know can firmly state, with scientific backing, that....
Time travel is real.
Crete? I heard that a biblical scholar said that Crete could be the Garden of Eden...who knows...I’m not an expert on it, but it is interesting...
I’d of thought the 6 mil years ago date would give creationists more of a problem than it presents to the theory of evolution which adjusts their thinking to fit the observations. There is nothing here to say that the hominid making these tracks didn’t evolve from earlier numbers of its species. Of course, there is also nothing to place it as our direct ancestor or to rule that out. We need more observations as always.
So the prints were made in soft sedimentary material by something or someone. Soft mud.
And that soft mud imprint lasted millions of years.
Okay.
There’s no small irony to be found in a bunch of Young Earth Creationists getting their yucks from the possibility that evolutionary theory will have to be adjusted to account for evidence that humanity has been around for six million years.
Does this mean that the YEC are acknowledging that the earth is at least six million years old?
Cretins!!!