Despite the guy going on and on (and on) about how breathtaking he was and repeating himself over and over, I could not figure out what the big revelation was. Someone help me out please. Thanks.
.
The big revelation is that the whole event was obviously carefully planned way in advance. (except for the death of one of the paid protestors)
.
Ah you didn't get it it. This is the Charlottesville "grassy knoll" video. I'm surprised it wasn't put into breaking news. :-)
Apparently this guy thinks the crash was staged and a van parked in the road is responsible for a Challenger plowing into it at a high rate of speed. Some people will buy it.
To me it was how long the maroon van was parked there and the fact that no one was around for a long time.
Also the police report stating that the van had “slowed down for pedestrians” which is 100% untrue. Not only was it not slowed down, there were virtually no pedestrians in front of for a long time.
Doesn’t mean anything nefarious per se, but why would the police lie about that?
Well, he does have a point that the police report is wrong. It says the van slowed down for a group of people but the van was clearly sitting there parked.
I’m not sure how significant of a point this is, but the video guy sure seems to think it’s a big deal.
The thing I keep coming back to is the disconnect between the media narrative of this being a terrorist attack and the fact that the guy in the Challenger didn’t drive into the crowd but rather rammed another car. The woman who was killed was apparently crushed by the rammed car.
The question that comes up is: does this really fit the pattern of a terrorist attack? If you want to kill people in a crowd, you drive into the crowd. You don’t ram some other vehicle sitting there.
The whole thing just doesn’t make a lot of sense.
the red van was parked for 5 minutes at least at 4th and water without any driver or passenger. the charger passed in front of the van along water towards third maybe 6 minutes prior to the accident.