“She was telling him what the hospital policy- based on current law- was in regard to tests for LE. She was not speaking to a doctor about the patient’s medical care, she was speaking with LEO about the legal issue of them getting a blood draw or the results of if one had already been done.”
None of the above is in the article. Thus was in the article:
“She told the officer a patient was required to give consent for a blood sample...”
After reading through this person’s posts it really does seem to be an Alaska Wolf retread. The convoluted logic and circuitous reasoning is the same. Signed up about a year before AW bought the farm.