Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America tests 'the most dangerous nuclear bomb ever produced': F-15 drops $1 trillion super-nuke
Daily Mail ^ | 08/29/2017

Posted on 08/29/2017 7:44:37 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: SeekAndFind
I'd go with the British Violet Club of the late 50s. Too heavy to carry in "safe" condition, it had to be armed before takeoff. Once armed it couldn't be made safe in air, and was too unstable to land with (or takeoff with if properly considered

Violet Club: Quite Possibly the Worst Nuclear Bomb Ever Fielded

41 posted on 08/29/2017 9:46:59 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy (Winter is coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It is inert. Isn’t that like dropping a rock? What’s to study?


42 posted on 08/29/2017 10:00:46 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (It feels like we have exchanged our dreams for survival. We just have a few days that don't suck.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If we are in a nuclear war and some cuck general dials this atomic bomb down to 300 tons of TNT and uses it then he should be shot in the face. What a waste of a expensive weapon.

If you are going to use a nuclear bomb then use a nuclear bomb and send your enemies to kingdom come.


43 posted on 08/29/2017 10:09:39 PM PDT by WMarshal (President Trump, a president keeping his promises to the American people. It feels like winning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

Why wouldn’t you always dial it to 11?


44 posted on 08/29/2017 10:22:07 PM PDT by IDFbunny (Fat shaming works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101
What’s to study?

At a guess: accuracy of the weapon ballistics dialed into the bombing/targeting software of the carrying aircraft. Penetraion tests as well, if that variant of bomb.

45 posted on 08/29/2017 10:37:31 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: basalt

Not me. A 0.3 KT nuke is enough to accurately destroy military outposts, political headquarters and ships. I don’t want a holocaust but an utter elimination of war fighting capabilities with minimal US casualties.


46 posted on 08/29/2017 11:05:16 PM PDT by aft_lizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sequoyah101

It has the exact duplicate of a live weapon except for the warhead, where an inert object with the same mass and balance is inserted instead.

They are studying the weapon’s ballistic characteristics so that, God forbid, if they have to use one, it will hit the target the pilot aims at.


47 posted on 08/29/2017 11:24:20 PM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: IDFbunny

Read post 13.

Take a Nork facility, for example. One of their nuclear weapons research facilities has a concentration camp of political prisoners next to it.
You want to use something extremely accurate so as to hit the target, but not hit human shields, if it can be avoided.

In a war one also has to think of the aftermath. You don’t want to replace one failed state with another. You want to eliminate the problem regime with minimal damage to infrastructure so that rule of law can be established as swiftly as possible. Leaving countries in chaos, damaged for a generation or two, continuously producing streams of refugees, only spawns more troublemakers looking for revenge- or invites third parties in to cause more problems- not to mention an unproductive country is a waste for everyone.


48 posted on 08/29/2017 11:26:17 PM PDT by piasa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

If an F15 can carry one, that means all our planes are potentially nuclear delivery platforms.


49 posted on 08/29/2017 11:37:05 PM PDT by SauronOfMordor (Socialists want YOUR wealth redistributed, never THEIRS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Not much bang for a trillion bucks.


50 posted on 08/29/2017 11:58:19 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Not my circus. Not my monkeys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: WMarshal

OK, now that you’ve establised how tough you are, try engaging your brain. Suppose we want to knock out a NK missile site 40 miles from Seoul. Still want to use the biggest nuke you can find, or the smallest one that will do the job?


51 posted on 08/30/2017 1:02:09 AM PDT by Hugin (Conservatism wiiohout Nationalism is a fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bump for later..


52 posted on 08/30/2017 1:44:56 AM PDT by momincombatboots (White Stetsons up.. let's save our country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

Fat Boy in North Korea is about to get a live demonstration


53 posted on 08/30/2017 3:03:40 AM PDT by njslim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Deakins: $1 trillion super-nuke that has an adjustable yield

Hale: Oh, crowd-pleasers!

54 posted on 08/30/2017 3:07:16 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #cishet #MyPresident #MAGA #Winning #covfefe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doorgunner69

“OK, why does adjustable yield make it so dangerous?”

I had the same question. I’ll take a wild swing at an answer. From the author’s perspective nukes are too dangerous to use, period. If, however, you could adjust the nuke down to just being a really small nuke a loose cannon like Trump would be tempted to use nukes to take out, say, the thousands of cannons that North Korea has on the DMZ threatening the South. And, once you use nukes successfully, it will be the go-to weapon of choice for wild, unpredictable Republicans to wipe out all that they see as evil in the world. (uhm.../s)

The hyperbole in the article is a result of the author’s liberal world view.


55 posted on 08/30/2017 3:16:18 AM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Verified: The B-61 adjustable-yield nuclear bomb has been around since 1963. A trillion-dollars? Well, if they’re using 2017 dollars, I can believe that over the last fifty years, we’ve spent $20 billion a year on our nuclear program.


56 posted on 08/30/2017 3:39:25 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

That makes no sense at all.


57 posted on 08/30/2017 3:45:04 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CJ Wolf

“delivered by an f16, we can put these on anything.”

https://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/a-4.htm

The Marine Corps A-4 Skyhawk is a lightweight, single engine attack aircraft. The mission of an A-4 attack squadron is to attack and to destroy surface targets in support of the landing force commander, escort helicopters, and conduct other operations as directed. Developed in the early 1950s, the A-4 Skyhawk was originally designated the A-4D as a lightweight, daylight only nuclear capable strike aircraft for use in large numbers from aircraft carriers.

Typical dry weight: 10,465 pounds
Wingspan: 26 ft 6 in
Length (excluding IFR Probe): 40 ft 3-1/4 in


58 posted on 08/30/2017 3:56:18 AM PDT by BwanaNdege ("The church ... is not the master or the servant of the state, but the conscience" - Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m curious about the $1T price tag. I don’t believe it for one moment, but I am curious. How did they invent that number???


59 posted on 08/30/2017 4:22:59 AM PDT by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kaehurowing

So do I. The hajj is supposed to be happening right now. It would take-out a lot of terrorists, or potential terrorists.


60 posted on 08/30/2017 4:54:29 AM PDT by EvilCapitalist (Lock her up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson