Another Obama/Clinton criminal thug faces reality without Comey to help him!
Is he the one who laughed and bragged about perpetrating the Obamacare fraud on the American people?
Where is the evidence to support the dismissal for fraud? What is in the “excerpt” doesn’t constitute such evidence.
In case you’re wondering, yes, gets to keep the $2.4 million.
the stupidity of the American voters
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Same thing BOTH parties counted on top pull off the Kenyanesian Usurpation.
A natural born citizen is born here with citizen parents.
No other citizenship(s).
Solely an American.
Why isn’t “fired” replaced with “indicted”?
If he committed fraud, what does it say Obamacare? Isn’t that fraud too?
The legel implications of him committing fraud would be voiding affordable healthcare act
in the interest of historical accuracy which this article appears to ignore, prof gruber was the architect for romneycare in mass, which became the template for obamacare.
Bump
Paging Jeff Sessions.........oh forget it, he recused himself from prosecuting any real criminals.
Wow! It couldn’t happen to a nicer &**%#@). Gruber has long been an example of a bad economist and bad professor. Dumb as a box of rocks and first to arrogantly call others what he himself actually is.
Good!
He was jus’ stealin’ like he did when he was Obama’s official “healthcare” liar.
There are still liberal idiots who think the majority of people are better off.
A small percentage, yes. Overall, the majority took a major hit.
but in the fantasy world of liberals, truth is an alien concept.
And Republicans in the Senate are OK with voters being tricked over ObamaCare.
Patriots are reminded that even if Obamacare was the greatest invention since sliced bread, it remains that the corrupt, uniparty Congress had wrongly ignored first securing the required constitutional consent of the states, a healthcare amendment to the Constitution, before establishing unconstitutional Obamacare.
In fact, the Roberts Court wrongly ignored, imo, that previous generations of state sovereignty-respecting Supreme Court justices had officially clarified that the states have never expressly constitutionally delegated to the feds the specific power to regulate, tax and spend in the name of INTRAstate healthcare. (Some non-legal opinions are also included.)
Regarding the Roberts justices bluffing that the Obamacare insurance mandate is constitutional for example, consider the third entry in the list from Paul v. Virginia. In that case the Court had clarified that the scope of Congresss Commerce Clause powers does not include regulating contracts, including insurance contracts, regardless if the parties negotiating the contract are domiciled in different states.
Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States. Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added]." Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"4. The issuing of a policy of insurance is not a transaction of commerce within the meaning of the latter of the two clauses, even though the parties be domiciled in different States, but is a simple contract [emphases added] of indemnity against loss. Paul v. Virginia, 1869. (The corrupt feds have no Commerce Clause (1.8.3) power to regulate insurance.)
From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added]. United States v. Butler, 1936.
"The smart crooks long ago figured out that getting themselves elected to federal office to make unconstitutional tax laws to fill their pockets is a much easier way to make a living than robbing banks." me
"Federal career lawmakers probably laugh all the way to the bank to deposit bribes for putting loopholes for the rich and corporations in tax appropriations laws, laws that Congress doesn't have the express constitutional authority to make. Such laws are based on stolen state powers and uniquely associated stolen state revenues." me
So if citizens want "government" healthcare, they need to work with their state lawmakers to experiment with healthcare programs that they think will work the best for their respective states.
And in the highly unlikely event that no state can come up with a really great healthcare solution that the rest of the states can base their respective healthcare programs on then the states can do this. They can amend the Constitution to give the post-17th Amendment ratification Congress left over from the lawless Obama Administration the express constitutional authority to regulate, tax and spend for Intrastate healthcare purposes.
Also, consider that although Trump is accomplishing a LOT as president, it remains that since the uniparty Congress wants to get rid of him that his first two years in office are arguably just practice. That being said ...
Drain the swamp sewer! Drain the sewer!
Remember in November 2018 !
Since corrupt Congress is the biggest part of the sewer (imo) that Trump wants to drain, it is actually up to patriots to drain the sewer in the 2018 elections, patriots supporting Trump by electing as many new members of Congress as they can who will support Trump.
In the meanwhile, patriots need to make sure that there are plenty of Trump-supporting candidates on the primary ballots.
Patriots need to qualify candidates by asking them why the Founding States made the Constitutions Section 8 of Article I; to limit (cripple) the federal governments powers.
Patriots also need to make sure that candidates are knowledgeable of the Supreme Court's clarifications of the federal governments limited powers listed above.
Also, unlike incumbent members of Congress who wrongly remained silent while misguided state officials abridged the constitutionally enumerated rights of citizens during the lawless Obama Administration, patriots need to make sure that candidates on the 2018 primary ballots commit to the following.
Candidates need to commit to making and enforcing 14th Amendment-related laws to prosecute misguided state officials who use state powers to abridge constitutionally enumerated protections, 1st Amendment-protected religious expression and free speech for example, such actions prohibited by Section 1 of the 14th Amendment.
14th Amendment, Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States [emphasis added]; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Again, drain the sewer! Drain the sewer!