Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moseley

I thought that a State may choose to assist in enforcing Federal law but could not be compelled to do so.


9 posted on 08/28/2017 7:45:08 AM PDT by captain_dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: captain_dave

I believe this was the opposite: the Feds wanted to prohibit Arpaio from enforcing existing Federal law.


15 posted on 08/28/2017 9:36:22 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: captain_dave

“I thought that a State may choose to assist in enforcing Federal law but could not be compelled to do so.”

In this case, it appears the plaintiff’s argument was that a policy contained in an executive order supersedes long standing law. Nonsense. That policy may dictate what course of action ICE may take since immigration is a federal matter, but MCSD holding an Illegal until notified by ICE what to do violates no law.


18 posted on 08/28/2017 10:51:23 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson