Democrats always have difficulty with numbers and basic arithmetic.
Remember that back in 2008 candidate Barack Obama visited 114% of the US states and had three more to go.....
Looks like Trump is right again!
btt
What do you expect from the most corrupt state in America ? I haven’t trusted a single, solitary election result out of that state in over 20 years, starting with when the Democrats stole Bob Dornan’s House seat in 1996. Countless GOP candidates have had their races stolen from them there.
Not since 1994 has a Republican ousted an incumbent Democrat Congressmember in this state, and you can’t tell me that isn’t enormous reason for suspicion of voter fraud when there are a whopping FIFTY-THREE House seats and the 2 Senators, and they’ve systematically eliminated HALF of those GOP Congressmembers since 1996. The math doesn’t favor such 100% Democrat odds.
I recall reading somewhere not long after the election that it was found that Hillary’s supposed popular vote victory margin came a great deal from only about two or three counties nationwide and Los Angeles County was one of them. Makes me think of a classic exchange between Benson and Chester Tate in an early episode of “Soap”, lol.
I was discussing this long ago, right after the election. I believe my guesstimate was a bit lower than this.
,,,,,,, only 108% turnout in Calif. indicates a lower than normal turnout . I suppose Hillary wasn’t all that popular with the illegals and deceased residents of Calif.
According to the original article, only LA county admits 144%. Another 10 counties had registered voters larger than the legal population, but under 144%. Apparently the rest of the CA counties were within limits (not to say there was no fraud).
It seems a bit of a stretch to apply this percentage to the entire state.
Or am I missing something?
Democrats always have difficulty with numbers and basic arithmetic.
Remember that back in 2008 candidate Barack Obama visited 114% of the US states and had three more to go.....
In North Korea they keep it under control, considerably less than crazy than California.
In NK only one hundred percent show up to vote.
for Kim, of course.
That leaves ~29 million adults. If even 10 million of those adults were either illegal or hadn't registered to vote (>1/3), that still leaves 19 million voters, not 13 million.
| Candidate(s) | Votes | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Hillary Clinton (D) | 2,464,364 | 72.03% |
| Donald J. Trump (R,A) | 769,743 | 22.50% |
| Gary Johnson (L) | 88,968 | 2.60% |
| Jill Stein (G) | 76,465 | 2.23% |
| Gloria Estela La Riva (P) | 21,993 | .64% |
I was pretty sure Dad voted, even though he’d been dead for 6 months.
Solution so simple: show ID to vote.
ping for later.
Your sources seem fairly reputable, but I quickly found data to contradict them.
The U.S. Census Department claims that there are 25 million voting-aged citizens in California. There are only 18 million voter registrations in California. About 13.2 million of those voted. That’s not much more than half of eligible voters.
