Posted on 08/18/2017 9:55:57 PM PDT by Innovative
Laws are suppose to be the same for all citizens... If a powerless citizen was advocated for the death of a President, how would that person be treated?
This idiot should be treated the same...
She’s a democrat so my guess is she will NOT resign.
Put her on admin. leave and take her off the payroll until she can be voted out by the senate.
You got your “answers” baby
Self defense
Goodbye Saint Michael. You can join him in hell.
Great pics; are we supposed to pretend those are “Americans”?
She’s probably in a gerrymandered district so she won’t have to; they’d just elect a clone anyway.
Ever since Hispanics passed blacks in numbers in 2000, it became clear that they would just be permanent spectators as the world continues to pass them by. At some point there will be more Hispanic representation in government (especially as they take control of formerly black cities), then they will be completely removed from public view. Their attempts to disrupt People That Matter will be met by Hispanic politicians and cops...
And all they can talk about is hate from the right. BTW-if the guy in Charlottesville really had this huge white supremacy connection, why isn’t the media flogging the story? I’m waiting for something substantive, other than ‘he was seen standing’ with them. Is that all they got?
No, she won't.
You got your answers baby...Self defense...Goodbye Saint Michael.
_________________________________
"On August 11, 2014, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) opened a civil rights investigation into the incident.[42] A spokeswoman for the FBIs St. Louis field office said the decision to open an investigation was not motivated by the protests and riots which had ensued.[43] Forty FBI agents went door-to-door looking for potential witnesses who may have had information about the shooting.[44] Additionally, attorneys from the Civil Rights Division and from the United States Attorneys Office were participating in the investigation.[45]
On March 4, 2015, the federal investigation cleared Wilson of civil rights violations in the shooting.
The investigation concluded there was no evidence upon which prosecutors could rely to disprove Wilsons subjective belief that he feared for his safety, that witnesses who contradicted Wilson were not credible, that forensic evidence and credible witnesses corroborated Wilsons account, and that the facts did not support the filing of criminal charges against Wilson.[10][46][47]
Credible witnesses did not support accounts that Brown had his hands up in surrender. He was not shot in the back. Forensic evidence showed he was moving toward Wilson. Numerous witnesses were found to have given accounts of actions they were unable to see from their vantage points, or to be recounting others accounts.[10][46][47]
[10] Mohr, Holbrook; Lieb, David A. (March 4, 2015). Feds: Evidence Backs Ferguson Officers Account in Shooting. Yahoo! News. Associated Press. Archived from the original on March 7, 2015. Retrieved March 9, 2015.
[46] Eckholm, Erik; Apuzzo, Matt (March 4, 2015). Darren Wilson Is Cleared of Rights Violations in Ferguson Shooting. The New York Times. Retrieved March 5, 2015
[47] USDOJ [United States Dept of Justice] 2015, p. 12.
______________________________________________
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.