It does meet the definition of domestic terrorism in our statute,
If the guy was just scared and panicked, it’s not terrorism. If he went there with the idea that he was going to mow some people down, it is terrorism.
Sorry, even then it is not terrorism. It remains vehicular homicide or even a lesser charge depending on the facts entered into evidence. But it was not terrorism. That word is bandied about far too much and calling any violent act by a lone individual against a group of people with different political view terrorism is erroneous.
Under 0bama, it would simply be “workplace violence.”