Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevin C

“It does meet the definition of domestic terrorism in our statute,”


Once you’ve determined intent it may.

If the guy was just scared and panicked, it’s not terrorism. If he went there with the idea that he was going to mow some people down, it is terrorism.


17 posted on 08/14/2017 8:09:01 AM PDT by robroys woman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: robroys woman
If he went there with the idea that he was going to mow some people down, it is terrorism.

No, it's still not terrorism.
20 posted on 08/14/2017 8:14:18 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: robroys woman

Sorry, even then it is not terrorism. It remains vehicular homicide or even a lesser charge depending on the facts entered into evidence. But it was not terrorism. That word is bandied about far too much and calling any violent act by a lone individual against a group of people with different political view terrorism is erroneous.


54 posted on 08/14/2017 9:01:13 AM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: robroys woman

Under 0bama, it would simply be “workplace violence.”


161 posted on 08/14/2017 1:10:01 PM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson